I think what is being said is power delivery is not linear/predictable. Which does not necessarily equal powerful.kasio wrote:power delivery to wheels is not smooth. the word wich is oposite to smooth. isnt that peaky?
I think what is being said is power delivery is not linear/predictable. Which does not necessarily equal powerful.kasio wrote:power delivery to wheels is not smooth. the word wich is oposite to smooth. isnt that peaky?
My interpretation of "peaky" was it delivered all its power in one big wallop at the top end, it wasn't linear at all. It's power curve being rubbish which directly affects it driveability.. You want a broad "r" shaped power curve, not a backwards "L" shaped curve. As demonstrated by this terrible sketch I just did.fellowhoodlums wrote:ok, not how I would descibe peaky. Means to me it is high not erratic, which is how i am reading your descriptions.
At least i know what's meant now.
At this point, IMHO decent would be 20bhp from Mercedes and then we finally get to see how good the car is. I just wanna see Alonso passing Vettel on pace and the smirk on his face .That would be redemption for me atleast for last 2-3 years of sadness.godlameroso wrote:Won't be long now, I've said it before, I'll keep saying it, I feel they're a few reliability tweaks from showing something decent.
Maybe Honda engine does not like being run detuned, by which I mean lower revs. The turbo speed probably goes below optimum into the lag phase that each time the boost kicks in there is a drivability issue. In probability this may not be the case in normal running as the turbo would just about be running within the required boost, and MGU-H patches in as and when requiredGhostF1 wrote:My interpretation of "peaky" was it delivered all its power in one big wallop at the top end, it wasn't linear at all. It's power curve being rubbish which directly affects it driveability.. You want a broad "r" shaped power curve, not a backwards "L" shaped curve. As demonstrated by this terrible sketch I just did.fellowhoodlums wrote:ok, not how I would descibe peaky. Means to me it is high not erratic, which is how i am reading your descriptions.
At least i know what's meant now.
http://i66.tinypic.com/r6zdlh.jpg
I believe the RA615H/616H were more in line with the "Peaky" graph based on a few quotes and comments over the last year or so (all without firm confirmation from Honda themselves of course, but it does add credence to it having poor driveability as noted by the drivers).
yes but its not peaky! i alredy gave some examples. video from tests is most likely also not result of peaky power delivery but it may be. its not very clear and you cannot isolate other factors there!DiogoBrand wrote:Wouldn't "bad driveability" be easily fixed by tweaking the ECU? I know that correcting hardware design issues with software changes isn't ideal, but would be way better than having ridiculous wheelspin out of every slow corner.
Anyway, those bursts of oversteer, from my perspective, aren't a clear indication of a bad car. Pretty much every car had it when I saw videos from the test.
I just hope they can sort out both the PU and the chassis. Would be better for McLaren and Honda to stay out of F1 than to have such pathetic performances for three years straight.
Of course most of those can be valid and some even are. And if you have nothing its first thing into mind, but you can check seperately different aspects of your assumptions. its all on video! its not like you have to make your opinion from pictures and results only. there are places where you can isolate other aspects.ringo wrote:I dont include the chassis with the blame as some are doing; the engine is the root of the poor handling, and its not that the drivers can fix this with their right foot. For Monaco i would still blame the engine too. In fact the engine will show most of its weaknesses in Monaco since there is more unsteady running and more varying demands.
The engine will simply deliver power in an underwhelming, or slow or poorly metered way relative to a mercedes or ferrari.
I think you can use an extreme example of driving your road car with a missing engine, or poor fuelling. It will buck and kick and will definitely throw off how smoothly your drive the car, even if you are going slowly.
How do you isolate one part of the car from another, unless you have internal performance figures?? The car is a whole, it's performance is a result of all the parts and if 1 of those parts isn't up to scratch then the rest will be compromised.kasio wrote:Of course most of those can be valid and some even are. And if you have nothing its first thing into mind, but you can check seperately different aspects of your assumptions. its all on video! its not like you have to make your opinion from pictures and results only. there are places where you can isolate other aspects.ringo wrote:I dont include the chassis with the blame as some are doing; the engine is the root of the poor handling, and its not that the drivers can fix this with their right foot. For Monaco i would still blame the engine too. In fact the engine will show most of its weaknesses in Monaco since there is more unsteady running and more varying demands.
The engine will simply deliver power in an underwhelming, or slow or poorly metered way relative to a mercedes or ferrari.
I think you can use an extreme example of driving your road car with a missing engine, or poor fuelling. It will buck and kick and will definitely throw off how smoothly your drive the car, even if you are going slowly.
you dont have to imagine or compare to road cars.
I've never read an article in that website before, but it's look like Spanish rubbish "Marca". I've stopped reading where it says "The company used at least five engines in the course of four days at Spain's Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya... ".Diesel wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/39183145
People are abandoning the sinking ship before the season has started!
adrianjordan wrote: How do you isolate one part of the car from another, unless you have internal performance figures?? The car is a whole, it's performance is a result of all the parts and if 1 of those parts isn't up to scratch then the rest will be compromised.
So how can you separate those things out simply by watching videos?
And do you honestly think Alonso would keep his mouth shut about the chassis but not the PU?