Could they be Red Bull people? To look for any benefit of 2019? (ok, it's offtopic. It is that the life of TR is so strange )
I do not know, it sounds very strange when he says they need new people for this.
Could they be Red Bull people? To look for any benefit of 2019? (ok, it's offtopic. It is that the life of TR is so strange )
can u guarantee it. this concept will not change for 2018 for honda, and they showed very good reliabiltiy in the latter stages. why so much hate. is your mind full of hate mclaren fanthere's gonna be plenty of DNF's 2018 season, and that Honda engine up until now has not proven to be the most reliable asset in the field. So it'd be smart to play the long game and score points through patience.
It's not hate to expect reliability problems when increasing performances in this era of PU's, Only Mercedes has managed to avoid it to any great degree.techman wrote: ↑21 Dec 2017, 09:12can u guarantee it. this concept will not change for 2018 for honda, and they showed very good reliabiltiy in the latter stages. why so much hate. is your mind full of hate mclaren fanthere's gonna be plenty of DNF's 2018 season, and that Honda engine up until now has not proven to be the most reliable asset in the field. So it'd be smart to play the long game and score points through patience.
I think you're a little confused.McHonda wrote: ↑21 Dec 2017, 10:52It's not hate to expect reliability problems when increasing performances in this era of PU's, Only Mercedes has managed to avoid it to any great degree.techman wrote: ↑21 Dec 2017, 09:12can u guarantee it. this concept will not change for 2018 for honda, and they showed very good reliabiltiy in the latter stages. why so much hate. is your mind full of hate mclaren fanthere's gonna be plenty of DNF's 2018 season, and that Honda engine up until now has not proven to be the most reliable asset in the field. So it'd be smart to play the long game and score points through patience.
Ferrari have done the next best, on another level to Renault and Honda, and they struggled with the re-sizing and reliability of the turbo last year and start of this year that these constant performance gains bring. Every increase in performance has a knock on effect elsewhere and things need adjusting along the way. This brings reliability concerns.
There's simply nothing to suggest Honda can do what Mercedes did rather than be another Ferrari at best or just another Renault. Unfortunately there's plenty to suggest they could do worse so it's a strange and overly optimistic viewpoint to think just because they are reliable now and there's no concept change there wont be any trouble when they make the considerable performance steps that's needed so any counter argument is far from hate and closer to common sense in truth.
We all hope they smash it and can do a Mercedes but can we stop pretending they already have and it's a done deal,it's embarrassing considering where we are in the pecking order. And anyone hoping simply for a Ferrari or Renault-esque result with reliability and are expecting some issues along the way isn't a hater.
Or I think TR is not under pressure to attract sponsorship hence the message/PR release is more candid? Maybe Honda learned the lesson and set realistic expectation?
and, not insignificantany driver that earns a penalty over 15 grid places, which is the equivalent of taking three extra new elements for the first time, will simply have to start from the back of the grid.
Rather than the positions of multiple penalised drivers being decided by how many grid places their penalties were ostensibly for, they will be lined up in the order of when they made the component changes.
you'll only have 3 engines during a season, so every element of that which becomes a 4th element will be penalized by sending you to the back of the grid (atleast in the equivalent case of 15 place penalties). But the important thing is here; first come, first served. that would mean that if you are the first team during the day that mounts a 4th element, you are the first team/car that gets a penalty, let's say you would be serving a 'classic' 15 place grid penalty. but your competition has qualified one spot in front of you and then grabbed that 4th element. bad luck for them, because they'll be still behind you because you changed it first.Changes to ensure that oil cannot be used as fuel
Introduction of a detailed specification for oil
Always? Their chassis was average at best this year. How in the hell do you expect STR to take 4th place, while you have to compete with giants like Ferrari, Mercedes, Red Bull, Renault and McLaren. They don't stand a chance. STR should be proud of if they beat Force India, Haas and Williams.Zynerji wrote: ↑21 Dec 2017, 23:53STR always seems to have a decent chassis. At least upper-midfield.
If the Honda turns out to be a beast after its very difficult teething phase and STR finds a few tricks in the installation, this could be a crazy long-shot for big points.
The real question will be reliability in 2018, for all finishers. No points early due to issues could spell HUGE points late when others take penalties.
I wonder what the line is on SkyBets for STR to take 4th place in the Constructors in 2018...
that will be interesting betI wonder what the line is on SkyBets for STR to take 4th place in the Constructors in 2018...