#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
I think you are right there!godlameroso wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 02:54https://imgr2.auto-motor-und-sport.de/M ... 168490.jpg
Is this a new mid wing?
Since the beginning of the season.GhostF1 wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 03:58I think you are right there!godlameroso wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 02:54https://imgr2.auto-motor-und-sport.de/M ... 168490.jpg
Is this a new mid wing?
I also don't recall the winglet join under Richard Mille being a twin element piece.
Blown front axle means you have to collect air for blowing, hence the bigger brake duct.
They’re likely bigger than usual for this week. Canada is one of the the toughest tracks of the season on the brakes so I expect a few teams will expand their cooling as a one-off. In the way you have Monza spec rear wings and Monaco spec steering racks you often see Canada spec brake ducts/cooling.
I can not recall any team/team member/driver statement that the new rear suspension is bad. Also, we didn't see any heavy redesign / tweaking attempts on it, so I think it's OK. Of course it's a compromise, but clearly they think they are on positive side overall.f1rules wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 10:34yeah its frustrating, around the bargeboard area i would not call the rb simple, but yes. Secondly rb's pu integration just seem miles ahead, i think the deficit is more pu integration and chassis then aero, especially the unconventional rear suspension geometry layout, im not convinced about, but we will see i quess if theyll update this area
Nice pictures here by the way
https://www.motorlat.com/notas/fotosF1/ ... aren-mcl33