Welcome to the forum! Based on your nickname, I take it you're one of us?mgpw02 wrote:Being a hardcore Schumacher fan have been waiting to see something like this for a rather long time =D>
Thank you. To be very honest a bigger of Schumi than the car he drives but definitely a bigger fan of Mercedes than Ferrari.NewtonMeter wrote:Welcome to the forum! Based on your nickname, I take it you're one of us?mgpw02 wrote:Being a hardcore Schumacher fan have been waiting to see something like this for a rather long time =D>
marcush. wrote:they cannot be fast without cheating.In fact RedBull are cheating alreadfy so how can anyone match their times?
-no part of the bodywork is allowed to flex vertically more than 3mm(last year 5) relative to the reference plane under ALL conditions.to state it passes all tests is not confirming it´s legal...- please forgive not quating the original words of the FIA regs but basically that´s what they wrote.
Last year's red bull front wing was definitely flexing more than 5mm. And this year's flexes even more...marcush. wrote:they cannot be fast without cheating.In fact RedBull are cheating alreadfy so how can anyone match their times?
-no part of the bodywork is allowed to flex vertically more than 3mm(last year 5) relative to the reference plane under ALL conditions.to state it passes all tests is not confirming it´s legal...- please forgive not quating the original words of the FIA regs but basically that´s what they wrote.
The problem is evidence. The tests are the only thing the FIA can really do to enforce the rules, but the static tests alone are proving not to be enough.bot6 wrote:Last year's red bull front wing was definitely flexing more than 5mm. And this year's flexes even more...marcush. wrote:they cannot be fast without cheating.In fact RedBull are cheating alreadfy so how can anyone match their times?
-no part of the bodywork is allowed to flex vertically more than 3mm(last year 5) relative to the reference plane under ALL conditions.to state it passes all tests is not confirming it´s legal...- please forgive not quating the original words of the FIA regs but basically that´s what they wrote.
So are you saying RB are being helped to cheat by the FIA?
Let's see what Brawn and Mercedes hold for this season before passing a verdict on Newey. I still believe Brawn has been the best around in F1.Raptor22 wrote:No RedBull are great because thy have the worlds most talented F1 engineer and pundit, Segedumbum under their employ
No, he can't be because he never ran a 3 element front wing on his cars...oh wait, he did on the BGP01..!! </sarcasm>mgpw02 wrote:I still believe Brawn has been the best around in F1.
The thing is, they could also use race pictures. There is plenty of technology that can be used nowadays to reverse engineer a shape from a simple photograph.Diesel wrote:
The problem is evidence. The tests are the only thing the FIA can really do to enforce the rules, but the static tests alone are proving not to be enough.
There are two solutions:-
1. Introduce new tests that are conducted while the car is in motion. Sensor rigs could be put on the car during practice, it's sent out to do a lap, and the FIA check the readings.
2. Introduce more standard components. Standardised wing sections made from stiffer materials.
Option 2 seems more like something the FIA would do, plus it would probably be cheaper and more successful. Look at ECUs, they couldn't find a way to easily ban certain driver aids, so they took control of the component that powers them.
Happens, I am sure it won't be long before I am targeted too for my obsession with Michael Schumacher.adrianjordan wrote:No, he can't be because he never ran a 3 element front wing on his cars...oh wait, he did on the BGP01..!! </sarcasm>mgpw02 wrote:I still believe Brawn has been the best around in F1.
(Welcome to the forum mgpw02, you're new round here so may miss that my sarcasm was not aimed at you but rather at another infamous member.)
mgpw02 wrote:Let's see what Brawn and Mercedes hold for this season before passing a verdict on Newey. I still believe Brawn has been the best around in F1.Raptor22 wrote:No RedBull are great because thy have the worlds most talented F1 engineer and pundit, Segedumbum under their employ