I think tyre wear would be one of the harder things to simulate. Smarter designers maybe understand a more holistic picture of what type of aero profile produces what type of tyre wear but you cant be entirely sure till you go testing. I dont think they 'chose' to have tyre wear. They designed the fastest, most efficient car they could and tyre wear is the by product.Xyz22 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2024, 14:40Just wanted to reiterate while underlining that i don’t agree with the premise that this approach pays off “later” as written in the article.KimiRai wrote: ↑28 Mar 2024, 14:03I think that's in the article itself, not sure why you said it again.Xyz22 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2024, 13:49I don't agree with this.
Generally, a car that is much quicker over one lap compared to race trim has significant issues that are "covered" by the super fresh softest compound.
When you need to deliver consistent lap times over and over with the same tyres that start to provide less and less grip you really see which cars are the best in terms of balance.
I just don’t understand why they went for this approach in the design phase (“peak performance”, especially after seeing Ferrari disaster last year).
Of course maybe this was unexpected which could be even worse as the design process final result was not what they expected.
They have talented individual in the Team so i’m sure they will improve through the season.
Maybe they need better aero solutions and then they can compromise to preserve tyre wear.