Aston Martin has had the worst pistops overall this season.
So you don't know of anything that he did poorly.Nikosar wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 14:12Culture and strategy come from the top down. Strategic decisions come from above the technical director, especially when there's pressure from Lawrence to deliver results fast.diffuser wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 13:17What did Whitmarsh do?Nikosar wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 10:48
Many speculated that AMR23 was a copy of Red Bull, but Fallows was announced in summer of 2021 and the agreement reached allowed Fallows to join Aston Martin only in April 2022. So he spent almost a year away from Red Bull, which logically distanced him from everything.
He probably brought the aerodynamic philosophical approach to the car but could not have copied. Plus, the Mercedes hardware, forced Fallows to forge his own aero path.
So AMR23 was indeed a successful car, then he failed to developed it but there's many factors in the equitation that led to the failure not uniquely his work, e.g. : Whitmarsh's management.
Whitmarsh comes from a different era, and while he has the credit from delivering the new factory on time and within budget his absence from F1 for seven years might mean his input is more business than on cutting-edge car philosophy. That could lead to mismatches with what a technical director like Fallows was trying to build. The floor upgrade strategy might even have been a Whitmarsh 's directive.
This is why Cowell was appointed, to rise the team to the standards to what he was used to at Mercedes.
He didn't sound happy on the radio... In retrospective, he might have just felt rushed for time after the steering wheel issue and having missed FP1. He did 1 fast lap on softs(2 laps), came into the pits for 4 turns more front wing, went back out for a quali run and abandoned it "he said the tires where finished" and started his long run.
I don't trust that data either. Actually, on Spanish tv they were saying Alonso didn't pit (so he was on heavy fuel load in his fresh soft lap) but... They were wrong in one thing. Alonso did pit. I was looking at the time table, and he was on pit a couple minutes after his fast lap try and the cooling one.FNTC wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 21:42https://preview.redd.it/these-were-the- ... 6e1d86106b
I thougt Aston looked like maybe the slowest car after FP1, but this one is puzzling. Lower fuel maybe, but 2 seconds faster than Hulkenberg on same tire and similar amount of laps? Over a second on Hamilton? I don't trust that its that good, but Alonso seems like he was cooking on that stint on softs.
I don't know about the data but I can tell you, you need to go into the garage to refuel and he never turned the PU off.Sedaxel wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 22:59I don't trust that data either. Actually, on Spanish tv they were saying Alonso didn't pit (so he was on heavy fuel load in his fresh soft lap) but... They were wrong in one thing. Alonso did pit. I was looking at the time table, and he was on pit a couple minutes after his fast lap try and the cooling one.FNTC wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 21:42https://preview.redd.it/these-were-the- ... 6e1d86106b
I thougt Aston looked like maybe the slowest car after FP1, but this one is puzzling. Lower fuel maybe, but 2 seconds faster than Hulkenberg on same tire and similar amount of laps? Over a second on Hamilton? I don't trust that its that good, but Alonso seems like he was cooking on that stint on softs.
I mean... Maybe he did refuel. Maybe everyone missed that and thought he didn't pit and refuel.
I don't know if he refueled, but I'm almost sure that he did pit.
Ok, then he didn't refuel. That's good news.diffuser wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 23:00I don't know about the data but I can tell you, you need to go into the garage to refuel and he never turned the PU off.Sedaxel wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 22:59I don't trust that data either. Actually, on Spanish tv they were saying Alonso didn't pit (so he was on heavy fuel load in his fresh soft lap) but... They were wrong in one thing. Alonso did pit. I was looking at the time table, and he was on pit a couple minutes after his fast lap try and the cooling one.FNTC wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 21:42https://preview.redd.it/these-were-the- ... 6e1d86106b
I thougt Aston looked like maybe the slowest car after FP1, but this one is puzzling. Lower fuel maybe, but 2 seconds faster than Hulkenberg on same tire and similar amount of laps? Over a second on Hamilton? I don't trust that its that good, but Alonso seems like he was cooking on that stint on softs.
I mean... Maybe he did refuel. Maybe everyone missed that and thought he didn't pit and refuel.
I don't know if he refueled, but I'm almost sure that he did pit.
i think that he brought a newey inspired design, but i doubt that it could have been a direct copy of anything. at the start of 23, nobody had brought a car that was well rounded at a good amount of tracks except for redbull. and now that newey has left redbull, they are struggling with that too. unfortunately, i think these crazy ground effect cars were more complicated than what fallows (or most other designers) had dealt with in the past. it doesnt seem like any of the teams are ever truely confident that the upgrades they bring are actually going to work anymore, or if its gonna bring in some bad bouncing or something that negates everything. and teams like aston seem totally clueless sometimes.Nikosar wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 10:48Many speculated that AMR23 was a copy of Red Bull, but Fallows was announced in summer of 2021 and the agreement reached allowed Fallows to join Aston Martin only in April 2022. So he spent almost a year away from Red Bull, which logically distanced him from everything.
He probably brought the aerodynamic philosophical approach to the car but could not have copied. Plus, the Mercedes hardware, forced Fallows to forge his own aero path.
So AMR23 was indeed a successful car, then he failed to developed it but there's many factors in the equitation that led to the failure not uniquely his work, e.g. : Whitmarsh's management.