(KVRC) TeamFuria TF14T

Post here information about your own engineering projects, including but not limited to building your own car or designing a virtual car through CAD.
User avatar
machin
162
Joined: 25 Nov 2008, 14:45

Re: (KVRC) TeamFuria TF14T

Post

Powershift wrote:i dont understand why the roll hoop air inlet is feeding air to the rear of the transaxle.
That is just streamlining... I think it looks very good! fingers crossed for an improved result!
COMPETITION CAR ENGINEERING -Home of VIRTUAL STOPWATCH

User avatar
CAEdevice
50
Joined: 09 Jan 2014, 15:33
Location: Erba, Italy

Re: (KVRC) TeamFuria TF14T

Post

There are same points that I'd like to have on my car (front wing, sidpods winglets, the small witdth of the sidepods) but I did not included them for Monza because I could not make them work as expected.

It seems that your rear wing is in a medium downforce configuration. For Monza my flaps are thinner (as you can see at thils page: http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewto ... 66#p505966). The DF generated by my rear wing is about 500N for Monza.

Thanks for sharing your pictures and data!

User avatar
AratzH
9
Joined: 07 May 2013, 09:24
Location: Michigan

Re: (KVRC) TeamFuria TF14T

Post

Your car looks great CAEdevice. I can see big improvements in the modeling process.
I did choose a "medium" downforce set up for monza, mainly because my car has have a low drag in the other events.
My Monza rear wing makes around 660 N of downforce, and I get around 600 for the front. I think where I loose the most downforce compared with Variante and CSR is in the floor. I can barely pass 550N...
Just as a curiosity, are you using some know airfoils in your wings or did you just made them in purpose?
MVRC -> TF

User avatar
CAEdevice
50
Joined: 09 Jan 2014, 15:33
Location: Erba, Italy

Re: (KVRC) TeamFuria TF14T

Post

Hi AratzH.

No, I'm not using known airfoils: I use a very simple profile composed by three arcs and I run a quick optimization studing the flow.
What surfaces do you include into "floor" definition? I include the reference and step surface but also diffuser. If you mean only the flat part I should measure the downforce to compare it with your value. Let me know and I'll give you the exact data as soon as I'll come back to office.

User avatar
AratzH
9
Joined: 07 May 2013, 09:24
Location: Michigan

Re: (KVRC) TeamFuria TF14T

Post

My car is an assembly and each part in made separately, so it is easyer to optimize. The "subparts" that make the floor are shown in the following picture:

Image

So what I call floor downforce is made of the flat parts pointing to the floor (plane and step plane), the diffuser, and the flat parts of the upper side.
MVRC -> TF

User avatar
CAEdevice
50
Joined: 09 Jan 2014, 15:33
Location: Erba, Italy

Re: (KVRC) TeamFuria TF14T

Post

ok, the same for my car. I'll measure the floor DF as soon as I'll be back at office (next tuesday). I have not enough cpu power at home :-)

PS: We should ask SWX for a sponsorship (joking)

User avatar
CAEdevice
50
Joined: 09 Jan 2014, 15:33
Location: Erba, Italy

Re: (KVRC) TeamFuria TF14T

Post

AratzH wrote:I think where I loose the most downforce compared with Variante and CSR is in the floor. I can barely pass 550N...
Hi AratzH, here is the value of my floor DF: 580N, not much more than yours

User avatar
AratzH
9
Joined: 07 May 2013, 09:24
Location: Michigan

Re: (KVRC) TeamFuria TF14T

Post

So, CAEDevice, we are pretty close in DF levels this time. I think it will get to see who has the less drag!

Now some interesting comparissons:

Image

Front wing is getting pretty close to what F1 is, at least in qualitative terms.
MVRC -> TF