It's not an opinion.
I don't complain probably because there's nothing really interesting about his articles, that makes me want to click on them.
Well actually I stand corrected, that's a complaint.
Point is, in a sea of various journalists, pseudo-journalists, and other dime-a-dozen wannabes, when it comes to F1, you really have to have something interesting to say to make it worthwhile reading. Simply regurgitating news that can be found across dozens of F1 news sites isn't all that interesting.
Even the high priests of F1 "journalism" have become little more than PR mouthpieces for all of the teams in F1, as well as the FIA. Everyone wants access to the gravy train of the F1 circus, and as such, they don't want to rock the boat lest their access suddenly be curtailed. The NFL has that problem. There's about 5 "journalists" who are anything but, and act as the official propaganda arm from which all proclamations are issued outwardly. The message then tumbles down the food chain from Mount Olympus. Where F1 lacks on the media side, is of strong opinions that actual challenge the usual accepted manner of thinking.
Whether one gets an official response from Ferrari is not at all a big deal as it's going to be some vanilla flavored response. Only if one is easily impressed by trivial matters, will they be taken with such things. I've had all manner of dialogue with book publishers and authors, and you know what the one thing is every one of those interaction has in common? They're totally unremarkable. Once the initial novelty wears off, it's business as usual, and your pulse doesn't budge an inch above its usual rhythm.