So it looks like the car's optimal operating window is at the ride height that causes excessive plank wear.
Yeah, it's over.
2013, McLaren switch from push rod to pull rod suspension and looked rather good in testing. Come the first race and they were pretty terrible (and was all season).
What happened Jenson?
‘We fitted a suspension component the wrong way round in testing so the car ran lower, giving more downforce but it would have worn the plank away and made the car illegal during the race’.
https://www.reddit.com/r/formula1/comme ... g_the_car/AutoRacer reported the leading paddock rumor for why Ferrari's performance dropped is the plank wear. .
Yeah it's over.Venturiation wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 13:11these are the posts from Australia
2013, McLaren switch from push rod to pull rod suspension and looked rather good in testing. Come the first race and they were pretty terrible (and was all season).
What happened Jenson?
‘We fitted a suspension component the wrong way round in testing so the car ran lower, giving more downforce but it would have worn the plank away and made the car illegal during the race’.https://www.reddit.com/r/formula1/comme ... g_the_car/AutoRacer reported the leading paddock rumor for why Ferrari's performance dropped is the plank wear. .
I think they should have kept the SF-24 suspension layout. It was a big gamble to change it on the last year of the regsSB15 wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 13:14I knew it. I honestly knew it.
Tracks like Canada, Singapore and Austin doesn’t allow Ferrari to run the car low enough because of the bumps. China I knew after Sprint Qualifying, Ferrari needs to raise the ride height because that car was running super low compared to other teams, which means, 99% of the SF25 performance data was due to it being super low to the ground.
Even in the off season, during the debut rear of the car looked nearly on the road.
Going double pull-rod was a big gamble and this race in China proved, they should’ve went Push-Rod on the rear instead.
they should have changed it to a model that everyone uses, they are the only car on the grid with that suspension layoutScuderiaLeo wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 13:21To be fair if they didn't change things people would've complained they weren't being adventurous enough.
But I really thought the team was better than this. The SF-24 had some weaknesses but it was a strong car. The strategy was good last season. How did we fall so far during the break? It's not just the car being bad, it seems like the entire team is worse off than last season.
It would also explain why the sprint went well. It is much shorter, plank doesn't have time to wear out so you can run lower and then change the setup for the race.Venturiation wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 13:01this means the rumors about australia plank problems where true, and this will happen every race if they don't lift the car