

An innovative solution to a rear downforce shortage.FakeAlonso wrote:
ya i think you mean negative camber. and that amount of camber is quite common in F1. look carefully at ground level shots of any F1 car in the past few decades and you'll notice it. And its there to increase the contact patch of the outside front while cornering not exactly for cornering stability just for higher cornering speeds. Positive camber was more common in the olden days when steering stability at high speeds and bumpy tracks was more important.JayeOFarrell wrote:From that photo they look to be running an awful lot of positive camber, perhaps they are trying to find some cornering stability?
Our experience is also that radial ply requires more neg camber than x-plies . Any comments on that ?JayeOFarrell wrote:Ahh thank you. I have just had a lecture on this but the lecturer said he was a little rusty because it had been a while since he had taught it. I'll inform him he has got positive and negative the wrong way round
camber? i´d say the rear tyres are toast in that picture so that´s the interesting bit...considering the fronts look fine.JayeOFarrell wrote:I was talking about front camber, I should have been clearer. Because of the photo the front left wheel’s camber seemed to be either aggressive or exaggerated.