Ferrari had room to pit Leclerc if they were worried about the weight. Just shows how close to the limits some of these cars are being run at.
I'm still quite surprised that the cars are weighted with tyres.
Let's be honest here, Haas only did what they did because they're trying to save resources this year with 2026 regs looming. They can't handle a big change in suspension layout like the bigger teams do. It's perfectly reasonable for a team like Haas, but not feasible for a team like Ferrari which has to consider performance ceilings of multiple paths of development and pursue the highest one if they want to have a shot at the title(s).SB15 wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 14:30You know who’s the biggest winner in all of this:
Haas, more specifically, Ayo Komatsu.
Ayo not going for the pull-rod front might be a blessing in disguise, because not only do you save a bunch of money on R&D for this years car and development with an architecture you’re familiar which is easier to manage, you also free up a lot more time dedicated towards next year car.
Now Haas got P5 and P8 as a result, love seeing them succeed.
haas didn't change because ferrari finished the suspension late when haas already made the 2025 car, same happened to williams and mercedes in 2023 and 2024Emag wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 14:36Let's be honest here, Haas only did what they did because they're trying to save resources this year with 2026 regs looming. They can't handle a big change in suspension layout like the bigger teams do. It's perfectly reasonable for a team like Haas, but not feasible for a team like Ferrari which has to consider performance ceilings of multiple paths of development and pursue the highest one if they want to have a shot at the title(s)SB15 wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 14:30You know who’s the biggest winner in all of this:
Haas, more specifically, Ayo Komatsu.
Ayo not going for the pull-rod front might be a blessing in disguise, because not only do you save a bunch of money on R&D for this years car and development with an architecture you’re familiar which is easier to manage, you also free up a lot more time dedicated towards next year car.
Now Haas got P5 and P8 as a result, love seeing them succeed.
I think the problem so far is in the lack of understanding of the settings of this car, otherwise why change the settings constantly, after almost every session, I think a new bottom can fix the situation
Weighing without tires would actually be a good idea, because it comes again (after RUS last year) with a very long last stint.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 14:35Ferrari had room to pit Leclerc if they were worried about the weight. Just shows how close to the limits some of these cars are being run at.
I'm still quite surprised that the cars are weighted with tyres.
Thank you for your insightful comment m8, the antiFerrari bar is raised constantly in the Ferrari thread from people who are not real Ferrari fans.Tonino wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 15:03The biggest clown team in F1, bar none. Even when they start the season with a good car, they always find a way to clown themselves out of a championship. Not to mention, they haven’t won anything in about 20 years. (Can’t say I’m not enjoying all of this, to be honest, after all the abuse Mercedes received last year from Lewis and his fans.)
When is someone at Ferrari going to take some accountability? Elkann? Vasseur? Seems like Vasseur is immune from any criticism because he’s giving off ‘good old Uncle Fred’ vibes.
While I can see the point here, they do all know the rules, planning to stay within them is intrinsic to any measured item.michl420 wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 15:01Weighing without tires would actually be a good idea, because it comes again (after RUS last year) with a very long last stint.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 14:35Ferrari had room to pit Leclerc if they were worried about the weight. Just shows how close to the limits some of these cars are being run at.
I'm still quite surprised that the cars are weighted with tyres.
And I say it again, this fuel draining before weighing makes no sense for me.
Probably because they reached the limit in developing car last year and still they were behind Mclaren. It is better to sort out suspension this year than next. Obviously this issue was not planned but it is what it is. I will really be disappointed if they are not ready next year for the next rules era.