raymondu999 wrote:I read the other time an article by Mark Hughes. He said that development of the F10 as well as the RB6 was done by focusing on optimising airflow around the chassis. This then meant that upgrades could come easier and they'd know sooner if updates would work as they understand the airflow so well.
But the W01 and the MP4-25, he said, seemed to be basic chassis pieces, but with main development going on (aero-wise) in the wings and diffuser to just kind of "bolt on" downforce. He reckoned that this way, the W01 and MP4-25 actually didn't have much potential for development. Judging from how similar the wings/diffuser look from last year, could it be the case that they've kind of "peaked" in terms of the car's potential?
Funny that W01 and MP4-25 had a lot of things going on in the body shape area already...and not much going on inthe wings and diffusser area..
To me generealisations are never going to give a proper answer there.
To solve a problem -lack of performance in Q3 ,elapsed time in Race- you first have to analyse and pinpoint the reasons for your underperforming.If it were as simple as stick on the RedBull front wing ...or difusser ...I´m sure it would have happened already.or would they not at least have a quick check in CFD what all these things on the RB6 will do? Maybe they all fell in the trap of looking too much on the wrong cars...F-ducts are fancy ...but noone copied the exhaust treatment of the RB not even Toro rosso...
Renault was the one team not to copy but developing their hack into a creditable peice of kit in a very short period...by concentrating on new ideas enhancing their downforce producing aerosurfaces .