Singapore Night GP 2008

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
nae
nae
0
Joined: 29 Mar 2006, 00:56

Re: Singapore Night GP 2008

Post

Singapore Night GP 2008

now that was entertaining
..?

User avatar
gcdugas
8
Joined: 19 Sep 2006, 21:48

Re: Singapore Night GP 2008

Post

Why no emphasis on Mac taking over the WCC points lead? Even BMW are within striking distance of Ferrari if Maranello can't get their act together for the last three races.

Speaking of BMW, does anybody notice that "the invisible", "the struggling", "the mediocre" Nick Heidfeld is just one point behind the vaunted Kimi Raikkonen driving an inferior car? He is doing so through consistency with no big 10 point wins to help boost his point total. Give us more such "mediocre" drivers. BMW should certainly keep him. If he were in a Mac he would certainly have won by now as has Heikki who is is beating in the WDC. And when things don't go his way he responds by putting his nose to the grindstone whereas Kubica has started to whine just a eencie weencie little bit.
Innovation over refinement is the prefered path to performance. -- Get rid of the dopey regs in F1

andartop
andartop
14
Joined: 08 Jun 2008, 22:01
Location: London, UK

Re: Singapore Night GP 2008

Post

what's so bad about heidfeld's performance? last time i checked he was only 8 points behind kubica, and that after usually starting every race 3-5 places behind kubica!!! this is good race performance for me, though he definitely needs to improve quali...

That was my opinion on Heidfeld's performance after the Hungarian GP. Even the difference with Kubica still stands!!!
I think BMW would be wise to renew his contract, he is a very experienced and solid driver. I wouldn't trade him unless I could get Vettel!
The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. H.P.Lovecraft

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Singapore Night GP 2008

Post

gcdugas wrote: ....My dates are correct. Michelin-gate was not Indy 2005, it was pre-Monza 2003 when the FIA decided that tires which were legal since 1998 were no longer legal as they changed measuring methods at the behest of Ferrari. Yes the Monty Indy DQ was in 2003 when he and Rubens got into a tussle...
Man, you ar living in a wold of myths. Fact is that the regulations say that a certain tyre dimension is the upper limit of width. It nowhere says that the dimensions can be exceeded before or after the race. Michelin exploited a loop hole in terms of taking advantage of a particular scrutineering method. When their creative interpretation was discovered the loop hole got closed. thats pritty natural. the rule wasn't changed. it was only enforced. you need to learn to read a rule. if it is 30 cm, than you have to have no more than 30 cm at all times.
Last edited by WhiteBlue on 28 Sep 2008, 22:41, edited 1 time in total.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

axle
axle
3
Joined: 22 Jun 2004, 14:45
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: Singapore Night GP 2008

Post

Back on topic I suspect...
WhiteBlue wrote:now Massa is fuelled for the finish. look out for a crash by Reikkonen. :wink:
:lol: - hats off to you - 100% on the money.

I have to take my comments on page 12 back - it wasn't the most boring race ever. And Piquet is a genius :lol: he deserves a second season for his self sacrifice!! :lol:

Well done Alonso and especially Rosberg.

Congrats to Ferrari for another team initiated balls up :lol: They will LOSE the championships rather than McLaren winning it at this rate!
- Axle

Badmon
Badmon
0
Joined: 16 Jul 2008, 00:07

Re: Singapore Night GP 2008

Post

One word...... KARMA!!!! F$@K Ferrari!!!! God does not like Ugly!! Kimi is out. I am going to have a lovely week!! :D :D

andartop
andartop
14
Joined: 08 Jun 2008, 22:01
Location: London, UK

Re: Singapore Night GP 2008

Post

It's just hard to explain why Kimi crashed out since MS was not on the paddocks. Or did anyone spot him?
The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. H.P.Lovecraft

User avatar
Ray
2
Joined: 22 Nov 2006, 06:33
Location: Atlanta

Re: Singapore Night GP 2008

Post

myurr wrote:
Just watched it again, and although the camera angle doesn't let you see what was happening with Sutil into the corner it shows clearly that if Sutil hadn't have crashed into the wall he would have hit Massa. So I think that he must have taken avoiding action. But a better camera angle would be needed to clarify.
Well good God! What was he supposed to do, sit there and let Sutil or someone else pile into him? Massa was doing the right thing and getting the hell out of the way. Sutil came into the corner completely unsighted, and to avoid Massa he hit the barrier. I see absolutely nothing wrong with Felipe getting out of the way and doing so as quickly as possible to avoid being sideways to oncoming traffic in a blind corner.

Though they did release him into pit lane and very well could have cause an accident. I don't lay blame with Massa though, he goes when he is told. That's his job. The chief mechanics job is to release the car into pit lane safely so I lay blame with him, or the methods he deems suitable to do so. The lights system doesn't seem to be working at all and I think they should go back to the lollipopman from now on.

I was so damn happy at work watching this over the live stream. Thanks from me goes to those who shared the links. Alonso winning could not have made me happier. The guy is showing just how much he is worth in a car. There is no equal in terms of overall driver performance in F1. Politics and team orders aside, any team not looking to secure his services is really screwing themselves. Give him number 1 status and he will win you multiple championships. No ifs and or buts. Alonso delivers every time.

Jesus, where did all the Ferrari hate bias come from in this forum? I guess Massa and Ferrari can cause someone else to lose control of thier car, but Hamilton and McLaren are totally innocent in Fuji of causing an accident? Hmm. HYPOCRITES!! And where are all the naysayers and complainers about night racing and safety? Tonight proved to the F1 community that they are NOT SPECIAL. People have been racing at night for as long as cars were driven in competition and just shows how arrogant and stupid F1 can be. I find it hilarious that everyone loved the night race after boohooing and complaing about it being 'gimmicky'. Welcome to real life, the weather is fine.

User avatar
Rob W
0
Joined: 18 Aug 2006, 03:28

Re: Singapore Night GP 2008

Post

Ray wrote:Well good God! What was he supposed to do, sit there and let Sutil or someone else pile into him? Massa was doing the right thing and getting the hell out of the way. Sutil came into the corner completely unsighted...
When I saw that incident I immediately thought: if that was a McLaren there would be an investigation for causing an on-track incident :roll:. After the replays I wasn't so sure.. hard call to make.

From watching the replays, I think Massa ought to have seen Sutil from quite a way off - enough to wait for him to go by. I'm not sure if he knew he wasn't on the racing line, but he wasn't far of it to be fair to him - so he probably thought clearing his car was urgent. Him doing so caused Sutil's crash so there should be a closer look at exactly what Massa and Sutil each could see from their positions. As I said, if it were a McLaren or someone causing a Ferrari ding I would expect this to be under investigation. No major conspiracy, just a gut feeling.

R

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Singapore Night GP 2008

Post

Quote of the day:
Rob Smedley(Massa's race engineer) wrote:... Today we were useless....
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

User avatar
gcdugas
8
Joined: 19 Sep 2006, 21:48

Re: Singapore Night GP 2008

Post

WhiteBlue wrote:Man, you ar living in a wold of myths. Fact is that the regulations say that a certain tyre dimension is the upper limit of width. It nowhere says that the dimensions can be exceeded before or after the race. Michelin exploited a loop hole in terms of taking advantage of a particular scrutineering method. When their creative interpretation was discovered the loop hole got closed. thats pritty natural. the rule wasn't changed. it was only enforced. you need to learn to read a rule. if it is 30 cm, than you have to have no more than 30 cm at all times.
Off topic I know but i have been challenged as to myths.

First the FIA was using a measurement method that they spec'd and used since 1998. Secondly the width could get real wide under full shock load bumping the kerbs in a chicane... B'Stone as well as Michelin. So much for your "at all times" reasoning. Also the tire, any tire, gets real wide when it is infalted with 2.0 psi and has ten mega-tons placed upon it. There was no "creative interpretation" or "loop hole". It was the same method the FIA had specified and used from the inception of the grooved tires. Bridgestone was free to do the same if they wished but it was more beneficial to destabilize the Michelin teams by getting the FIA to change mid-stream suddenly and drastically rather than choose a whole new development path.

You probably wouldn't like to read some of the choice words your beloved Mario Theissen had to say about the matter. One of these days Ross Brawn will do a "kiss and tell" interview or write his memoirs and all the dirt will come out.

Now back to the Singapore race..... What is it with Kimi? Will he ever get the fire back?
Innovation over refinement is the prefered path to performance. -- Get rid of the dopey regs in F1

myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Singapore Night GP 2008

Post

Ray wrote: Well good God! What was he supposed to do, sit there and let Sutil or someone else pile into him? Massa was doing the right thing and getting the hell out of the way. Sutil came into the corner completely unsighted, and to avoid Massa he hit the barrier. I see absolutely nothing wrong with Felipe getting out of the way and doing so as quickly as possible to avoid being sideways to oncoming traffic in a blind corner.
That's exactly what he should have done - sit there and wait until he could safely rejoin the track.

One or other driver should be at fault as I believe there were waved yellows at that corner at the time. So either Sutil came in there too fast and dangerously, or Massa pulled into his path. Sutil suggested the latter in his race comments.

Frankly I think that Massa still has mind management issues when dealing with disappointment and setbacks - understandably so, he's human, and he's by no means the only driver. So before you accuse me of all kinds of evil bias I also think that Hamilton shows occasional signs, as does Alonso.

I think that he was so frustrated with dropping the car at that point that he wasn't even particularly looking, or misjudged the gap to Sutil, and pulled out in front of him.

Either way the next time you grumble about a Hamilton overtake or some such, and say he should be black flagged, remember this avoidable accident and remember that it's gone unpunished.

User avatar
Chaparral
0
Joined: 01 May 2008, 13:10
Location: New England District NSW Australia

Re: Singapore Night GP 2008

Post

WhiteBlue wrote:Alonso makes big profit from his team mates crash. I would not put it behind Briatore to engineer something like this.

=D> Bravo Bravo another ridiculous conspiracy theory Gordon - you havent improved have you with the enforced move here - its a wonder you havent sledged Williams - oh sorry I see you have - poor old Mario got the thin edge of the wedge with the alignment with Wiliiams I think not sunshine - stop sprouting crap.

Congrats to Freddy good win and good support from the team its been a long time between drinks. :)
The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free and good men die like dogs - there's also the negative side' - Hunter S Thompson

User avatar
Ray
2
Joined: 22 Nov 2006, 06:33
Location: Atlanta

Re: Singapore Night GP 2008

Post

myurr wrote:
That's exactly what he should have done - sit there and wait until he could safely rejoin the track.

One or other driver should be at fault as I believe there were waved yellows at that corner at the time. So either Sutil came in there too fast and dangerously, or Massa pulled into his path. Sutil suggested the latter in his race comments.

Frankly I think that Massa still has mind management issues when dealing with disappointment and setbacks - understandably so, he's human, and he's by no means the only driver. So before you accuse me of all kinds of evil bias I also think that Hamilton shows occasional signs, as does Alonso.

I think that he was so frustrated with dropping the car at that point that he wasn't even particularly looking, or misjudged the gap to Sutil, and pulled out in front of him.

Either way the next time you grumble about a Hamilton overtake or some such, and say he should be black flagged, remember this avoidable accident and remember that it's gone unpunished.
It's quite obvious you can't see a very dangerous situation when it's presented to you. Massa was sitting perpindicular to oncoming traffic, at the end of a braking zone, around what is effectively a pretty blind corner, and there were cars coming even after Sutil. So you are saying that he should have presented the broad side of his car to the dangers of someone coming into that corner too hot and spearing his cockpit from the side with another cars nosecone. How in the hell does it make sense to do that?

I don't see how you can want punishment for a guy that prevented a more dangerous situation by sitting still in a blind corner with the front of his car in the racing line. You obviously have some sort of bias because you can't objectively observe the circumstances. I haven't said anything about Hmailtons conduct, which he did a fantastic job today staying out of trouble and just riding the race out like he should, so I don't know why you brought that up. Take a step back and look at the orientation that Massa was in, and put yourself in his shoes and think about what you'd do.

myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Singapore Night GP 2008

Post

Ray wrote: It's quite obvious you can't see a very dangerous situation when it's presented to you. Massa was sitting perpindicular to oncoming traffic, at the end of a braking zone, around what is effectively a pretty blind corner, and there were cars coming even after Sutil. So you are saying that he should have presented the broad side of his car to the dangers of someone coming into that corner too hot and spearing his cockpit from the side with another cars nosecone. How in the hell does it make sense to do that?

I don't see how you can want punishment for a guy that prevented a more dangerous situation by sitting still in a blind corner with the front of his car in the racing line. You obviously have some sort of bias because you can't objectively observe the circumstances. I haven't said anything about Hmailtons conduct, which he did a fantastic job today staying out of trouble and just riding the race out like he should, so I don't know why you brought that up. Take a step back and look at the orientation that Massa was in, and put yourself in his shoes and think about what you'd do.
For a broadside accident Sutil would have had to had lost complete control of his car, if he'd just run a bit wide then at worst he would have taken Massa's nose off. Such an accident should have been impossible as it was under waved yellows so all drivers passing through that section should have been running slower and more cautiously than usual.

Had Massa stayed still then Sutil would have had enough room on the racing line to have made it past. Look at the replay again, the racing line is incredibly tight. And had Massa's nose been in the way then he himself wouldn't have been able to pull out like he did due to the F1 cars awful turning circle (even allowing for lighting up the rears to spin the car round, which Massa did slightly but not massively).

So by moving Massa, instead of avoiding an accident, caused one.