SR71 wrote: ↑04 Apr 2017, 22:32
At best we get a bunch of drama as they cave to their own inadequacy and finally bring in some people who actually understand how F1 works.
What F1 are you talking about? That F1 where manufacturers where allowed to solve their problems as fast as they needed to? Or current one where manufacturers are not allowed to solve their problems until several races ahead, in best case scenario (2017)?
What I mean is, Honda development in past 3 seassons is the usual development any manufacturer would have had in maybe 6 months. But if they did need 3 years for something wich usually takes 6 months that´s only due to FIA restrictions, not Honda incompetence. Well they obviously did a lot of things wrong, but all manufacturers makes mistakes while developing new products, that can´t a surprise. The difference is in current F1 engines/PUs are restricted, when some time ago they could use whatever number of engines, allocations, track testing days, modifications, etc. they needed to overcome their problems
Wich to me is the obvious reason for BMW or Audi to NOT enter F1. I don´t bother to enter those speculation threads because I´m sure with current rulebook no other PU manufacturer will dare to enter F1 again. Honda was brave enough to assume the risk, and they´re paying a high price. It would take an idiot to repeat same mistake again, despite all the bickering, Honda is far from a small or new company to this, their huge problems IMO are a symptom of a much higher problem