Stroll wasn't my main point (although a minor point: How useful is his feedback?). The performance of the car is the most important, but I don't see yet how Krack is a problem. In comparison to Mclaren (for example) Aston Martin still have some low hanging fruit in their way. They don't make their own rear suspension (not optimized for their car). They also don't have their own windtunnel (efficiency). Both of these limitations are on track to be resolved by 2026.xReVo wrote: ↑07 May 2024, 22:59You have to explain to me what the performance of the Aston Martin has to do with Stroll. Do you really think that the constructors' ranking is of interest to anyone? Enough, with or without Stroll this is the carAR3-GP wrote: ↑07 May 2024, 16:47Wheatley would be a good signing for Aston Martin, but I struggle to see how this falls on Krack. He actually recruited a lot of good people to their organization unlike Mercedes who lost tons of important engineers under their team principal’s watch.
Also, there is only going to be so much a team can do with Stroll as a driver. They might be level on points with Mercedes with a different driver in that seat. Not Krack’s fault.
It's still a "new" team. I would say they are a year behind Mclaren in terms of their reorganization/infrastructure development.