ispano6 wrote: ↑05 Mar 2026, 19:17
GoranF1 wrote: ↑05 Mar 2026, 17:44
Aston Martin drivers position in AUSgp.
Fp1 P19 P20
Fp2 P14 P19
Fp3 P14 P16
Q P12 P15
R DNF DNF
All in favor of car 14.
2025 Round 1 results.
Q - P13 P19 (alonso, stroll)
R - P15 P17 (0 Championship points).
Aston Martin needs Rob Marshall. They need to sort out the chassis. The suspension has to be looked at by AMR. And perhaps it needs to look where there are aggressive design choices made, like the linkage to the monocoque for the front suspension wishbone swept far back toward the safety cell. Could vibrations from the front suspension to this area of the monocoque contribute? Could the length of the wishbone itself cause an oscillation? To understand the vibrations, the entire platform must be considered.
Yeah, so you think Adrian Newey got it all wrong and doesn't know these things I guess. By the way, no one mentions him, there is also a certain Bob Bell.
We have to consider the real problems, currently neither Honda nor Adrian have mentioned the front suspension, it's just our idea from the onboard videos.
They haven't touched any of the car's settings yet, focusing exclusively on vibrations and their origins. The chassis and aerodynamics can't yet be judged, I'm not saying it, they said it.
I understand that the mp4-18 comes to mind as in nightmares, but at the time there was no CFD, the gallery and all the rest advanced like now. Then it didn't even race, the 2003 one without updates played out for the world championship hands down but nobody remembers it.
But I'll try to clarify this car: The MP4-18 was years ahead of its time.
Extreme sidepods (precursors of modern cars),highly inclined radiators and ultra-tight packaging. So basically up to this point we are in line with amr26.
What was it about him that shocked others? The orward-facing driving position.
The driver was much further forward than in other cars.This served to: improve the center of mass and improve rear-end aerodynamics.
Furthermore, also the transmission was:
super short (ultra compact), very light and integrated into the aerodynamic packaging.
However, we don't know how the Aston Martin gearbox is structured and it doesn't seem to me that the driving position is that forward, quite the opposite.
But do you want to know the final straw?True the mp4-18 failed and so did the mp4-19 inspired by her. But the real evolution was the MP4-20, a car that had the same characteristics as the 18, but no one ever said anything about it. Because sometimes it's easier to see what went wrong than the other way around, the MP4-20 was another Newey perfection developed with ideas from 2003.
For example, no one mentions the KERS in Rb7. It didn't work at first, they said it would cause serious fire problems. How did it end? Total domination from the second half of the season.
This is just to let you know that it is too early to judge, Peter Windsor himself has said that he expects things to go well.