According to the poster above you it means new parts, same layout.saviour stivala wrote: ↑18 Oct 2018, 13:44“Renault to have a new engine for 2019” What does a new engine mean in technical design terms? Do they mean an all new design, concept/architectural wise? Or an upgraded engine.
I don't think an upgraded engine, but a complete new PU. Maybe they will keep the "old" Turbo and MGU-K.saviour stivala wrote: ↑18 Oct 2018, 13:44“Renault to have a new engine for 2019” What does a new engine mean in technical design terms? Do they mean an all new design, concept/architectural wise? Or an upgraded engine.
However it's become clear to Renault that the development potential of the engine is limited and they have therefore chosen to go down a new development path with a new power unit design, which Renault F1 managing director Cyril Abiteboul believes will enable greater gains.
.“Given the ambition in terms of power improvement for next year, pretty much all of the engine will be new,” added Abiteboul. “Not only on ERS side, because there is little power and little performance to extract there, but the rest of the ICE will be new.
"With the MGU-K that we now use, we have not had any problems at the dyno or on the track, the last specification of the turbo seems okay, but it is not in all cars to avoid grid penalties."
A rear turbo looks just fine combined with the flow through the airbox and air-air intercooler above the turbocharger. Less restrained turbine sizing, less vibration problems with the shaft.
On sheer acceleration up to ~300 kmh ferrari had mercedes beat pretty much all season long.godlameroso wrote: ↑18 Oct 2018, 22:28Yes, you're right the Ferrari is a good engine, and the rear end is a good package. It's still behind the Mercedes though, and even if the engines are similar in output, harvesting potential, etc, the standings don't lie, the benchmark engine is still a split turbo setup, and has been for the last 4 years.
What means Renault is very active, don´t give up, and keep changing his motor as much as necessary to close the gapgandharva wrote: ↑18 Oct 2018, 19:00Remember remember...
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/12819 ... -different
And don't forget. We will close the gap next year! As every year since 2014... Poor McLaren...