The perspective from Tost:On the other hand, Red Bull also had a very friendly side. While they were strict about technology, there was a sense of unity that emerged when we shared the common goal of winning. This unity was both the technical and as teammates sense, and I found the work tough, but very enjoyable.
Through working with Red Bull, Honda was able to learn much. As an engineer, there were certainly many technical details to learn, but more importantly, I was reminded of the importance of pushing to the limit and persevering. In pursuing victory, what specifically does “committed to winning” mean? One commitment is to think problems through relentlessly, and I believe I was reminded of this. I believe that Honda’s young engineers and track-side staff have also gained a lot from this mindset.
Around that time, Honda approached us with a proposal. I believe it was around the time of the 2017 Belgian Grand Prix. They asked us if we were interested in Honda, as it was having significant issues with McLaren. I told them we would consider it, and immediately held a meeting with Helmut Marko, Red Bull Motorsport Advisor, and Masashi Yamamoto, then Honda’s Motorsport Division Manager, and flew to Japan to meet Honda’s headquarters. I strongly advised Honda that if they continued their F1 activities, they would definitely succeed. We quickly investigated what was happening between Honda and McLaren, and discovered that sufficient technical feedback was not being provided from the McLaren side. After visiting the HRD Sakura factory, I was confident that if we provide sufficient feedback and work together with Honda, we would definitely succeed. Honda had the financial strength and resources to make it happen. I spoke with Takahiro Hachigo, Honda’s President, saying, “If we proceed with a strong development program together, we will definitely find a way forward.”
Remember, they were testing the battery vibration fix. There might be more deployment in FP3, one hopes.Badger wrote: ↑06 Mar 2026, 22:53Just watched the onboard from FP2. The car is shaking to bits, felt like I was getting nerve damage just by watching, and that is with the engine turned down massively. It doesn't look like they are harvesting much at all. I don't understand how this was not discovered on the dyno, it must have been.
Its possible they don't qualify for ADUO if the ICE is within the 2% limit on the bench but the problem is with the MGU-K and battery which aren't covered by ADUO and are currently homologated till the 2028 season.TyreSlip wrote: ↑06 Mar 2026, 22:52ADUO is the only thing that has me intrigued for the second half of the season. Having been a fan of Alonso through McLaren-Honda, it is hard for me to have any expectations.Sedaxel wrote: ↑06 Mar 2026, 22:47It's not looking good at all. Even so, Alonso said today that they are "much less negative than the media".
Honda seems to have done the development with not experienced engineers. I just hope they're excellent ones (I guess that not every mediocre engineer can be hired by Honda to work at Sakura un these kind of projects).
So I'm forcing myself to have some hope and see if some kind of McLaren miracle happens in the second half of the season.
It has to be demotivating for the drivers to ride around the track 5 seconds off the pace for the first half of the season.
They should definitely have asked a rude loaded question, based on unsubstantiated rumors. That always goes down well.avantman wrote: ↑06 Mar 2026, 17:50I’m gutted there was no one brave enough in the room to ask Newey if part of those issues could come as a consequence of very late and drastic changes Honda had to make at Newey’s command upon arrival, as Satoshi Tsunoda revealed. I mean I understand none of the Brits would ask a question like that ever, but others….F1 journalism is really dead.
It is not unsubstantiated but it's definitely a pretty rude question to ask and I agree there. It only adds fuel to fire.mzso wrote: ↑06 Mar 2026, 23:54They should definitely have asked a rude loaded question, based on unsubstantiated rumors. That always goes down well.avantman wrote: ↑06 Mar 2026, 17:50I’m gutted there was no one brave enough in the room to ask Newey if part of those issues could come as a consequence of very late and drastic changes Honda had to make at Newey’s command upon arrival, as Satoshi Tsunoda revealed. I mean I understand none of the Brits would ask a question like that ever, but others….F1 journalism is really dead.
gearboxtrouble wrote: ↑06 Mar 2026, 23:36Its possible they don't qualify for ADUO if the ICE is within the 2% limit on the bench but the problem is with the MGU-K and battery which aren't covered by ADUO and are currently homologated till the 2028 season.TyreSlip wrote: ↑06 Mar 2026, 22:52ADUO is the only thing that has me intrigued for the second half of the season. Having been a fan of Alonso through McLaren-Honda, it is hard for me to have any expectations.Sedaxel wrote: ↑06 Mar 2026, 22:47It's not looking good at all. Even so, Alonso said today that they are "much less negative than the media".
Honda seems to have done the development with not experienced engineers. I just hope they're excellent ones (I guess that not every mediocre engineer can be hired by Honda to work at Sakura un these kind of projects).
So I'm forcing myself to have some hope and see if some kind of McLaren miracle happens in the second half of the season.
It has to be demotivating for the drivers to ride around the track 5 seconds off the pace for the first half of the season.
Honda said ADUO is useless if they don't understand where the vibration is coming from.TyreSlip wrote: ↑06 Mar 2026, 22:52ADUO is the only thing that has me intrigued for the second half of the season. Having been a fan of Alonso through McLaren-Honda, it is hard for me to have any expectations.Sedaxel wrote: ↑06 Mar 2026, 22:47It's not looking good at all. Even so, Alonso said today that they are "much less negative than the media".
Honda seems to have done the development with not experienced engineers. I just hope they're excellent ones (I guess that not every mediocre engineer can be hired by Honda to work at Sakura un these kind of projects).
So I'm forcing myself to have some hope and see if some kind of McLaren miracle happens in the second half of the season.
It has to be demotivating for the drivers to ride around the track 5 seconds off the pace for the first half of the season.
"First, we need to identify the cause of the vibration; otherwise, no matter how much we update, it won't make any sense"
https://www.f1oversteer.com/news/adrian ... in-plight/“Being realistic, this season is first of all, as I mentioned, getting on top of this vibration problem so we can run reliably, and from there to see how much performance they can add to the combustion engine in particular.
“Then at the same time, of course, Honda needs to start working on the ’27 engine because it’s clear that a very large step in combustion engine power is needed for ’27, and that has to be their sole focus.”
I think your timeline is off by about a year. Honda achieved rough parity with Mercedes by the start of the 2021 season, which is to say before Red Bull's big hires from Mercedes.mvfad wrote: ↑06 Mar 2026, 20:08Wasn't it pretty obvious to everyone that the "Honda" engine Red Bull has been using for the past few years wasn't actually a Honda engine? That the RBR engine only improved after the numerous hires of professionals from Mercedes' engine division, who had nothing to do with the Japanese manufacturer?
So I don't understand this surprise regarding Honda. To me, this was always obvious. Or am I mistaken? To me, it doesn't make sense that they signed with Honda "wanting" the RBR engine.
Besides, Newey worked at RBR, so he knew things better than anyone.