Better quality image.
Same route as AM, but a little less undercut and a bit shorter sidepods.
I wouldn't say there's no downwash. It looks like the sidepods are concave. Could direct air down to the rear in that manner.
What? There is no undercut there. The initial part of the sidepod is sloped, and that maybe is giving you the idea of an undercut. But it stops very soon and its intended purpose is to generate outwash to deflect the tire wake.
It looks like it has around the same amount of undercut as the 2014 Caterham. Just straight down.
Is that pushrod at front and pullrod at the rear?AeroDynamic wrote: ↑16 Feb 2022, 16:36Better Quality:
https://i.imgur.com/KcFErZi.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/HZy8sc5.jpg
^Brigthened
• Tea Tray is similar to AMR22
• Extremely narrow Side Pods inlet openings
• A pronounced assortment of Louvres on the side pod top and engine cover area.
• Broad wide and large side pods with quite a shallow undercut
• First concept using some sort of downward slope design on the top surface of the sidepods
Finally someone who shares my view. I don't know why people are saying that car has an undercut.
The top of the sidepods looks funky.AeroDynamic wrote: ↑16 Feb 2022, 16:36Better Quality:
https://i.imgur.com/KcFErZi.jpg
• Tea Tray is similar to AMR22
• Extremely narrow side pod inlet openings
• A pronounced assortment of Louvres on the side pod top and engine cover area.
• Broad wide and large side pods with quite a shallow undercut
• First concept using some sort of downward slope design on the top surface of the side pods
• Triangular Roll Hoop