radosav wrote:DarkSurferZA wrote: ↑14 Apr 2018, 08:57
Obviously not the best chassis on the grid...
With all the stick they gave the underperforming Honda last year, I am not in the game of showing them leniency for their underperformance.
Although I am sad to see a team with the heritage of McLaren as far back as they are, I wouldn't be sad to see them mugged in the media the way Honda was. Slower than red bull with the same engine, slower than Renault with the same engine, slower than Haas with "last year's Ferrari chassis"... Not the best chassis on the grid by far. "GP2 chassis!"
Sent from my SM-T815 using Tapatalk
Well it is diferent engine than last year. Not same cog or weight. It affects chassis.
The best chassis is the one that works, the one that's fastest, with the engine in it. It's not the one that's the best on the wall posters.
I am not as pessimistic about their ability to recover, but the dream was sold last year and again at the testing sessions. They we're not forgiving of Honda, they did not say "or size zero concept may have pushed Honda to...". Claims pointing every failure to Honda even when it turned out to be hydrolics.
"GP2 engine" claims were just asking for the microscope to come back to McLaren chassis
Sent from my SM-T815 using Tapatalk