If the 2.2 million dollars resulted in more performance gain than performance losses this penalty will cause, then it's not harsh enough. Simple as that.
.LM10 wrote: ↑31 Oct 2022, 16:43.
If the 2.2 million dollars resulted in more performance gain than performance losses this penalty will cause, then it's not harsh enough. Simple as that.
Losing the gained performance should be the minimum and to make a proper penalty out of it they should lose even more performance than they gained. Relatively spoken of course.
Not a popular opinion in this thread, but it is how it is.
I think it is just $536500. If the gap between rivals comes from this, it is easily enoughLM10 wrote: ↑31 Oct 2022, 16:43If the 2.2 million dollars resulted in more performance gain than performance losses this penalty will cause, then it's not harsh enough. Simple as that.
Losing the gained performance should be the minimum and to make a proper penalty out of it they should lose even more performance than they gained. Relatively spoken of course.
Not a popular opinion in this thread, but it is how it is.
If we think about it, last's year crash at Silverstone, which was ruled into a fault from Lewis Hamilton, cost the team much more than this amount, because they had to replace the whole chassis. Easily worth more than 1 million, estimated at 1.8 million $. https://www.espn.com/f1/story/_/id/3186 ... fia-actionetusch wrote: ↑31 Oct 2022, 17:50I think it is just $536500. If the gap between rivals comes from this, it is easily enoughLM10 wrote: ↑31 Oct 2022, 16:43If the 2.2 million dollars resulted in more performance gain than performance losses this penalty will cause, then it's not harsh enough. Simple as that.
Losing the gained performance should be the minimum and to make a proper penalty out of it they should lose even more performance than they gained. Relatively spoken of course.
Not a popular opinion in this thread, but it is how it is.
Other teams had big crashes with big associated costs and managed to stay in budget. One team had a similarly expensive crash and turned down the opportunity to tyre test because of the costs and the budget cap.PierreW wrote: ↑31 Oct 2022, 19:11If we think about it, last's year crash at Silverstone, which was ruled into a fault from Lewis Hamilton, cost the team much more than this amount, because they had to replace the whole chassis. Easily worth more than 1 million, estimated at 1.8 million $. https://www.espn.com/f1/story/_/id/3186 ... fia-actionetusch wrote: ↑31 Oct 2022, 17:50I think it is just $536500. If the gap between rivals comes from this, it is easily enoughLM10 wrote: ↑31 Oct 2022, 16:43
If the 2.2 million dollars resulted in more performance gain than performance losses this penalty will cause, then it's not harsh enough. Simple as that.
Losing the gained performance should be the minimum and to make a proper penalty out of it they should lose even more performance than they gained. Relatively spoken of course.
Not a popular opinion in this thread, but it is how it is.
It's crazy to think about how much a single crash can cost, a 25 points deficit and a huge burden for the budget cap.
Staff fatigue imoFromGP2toWDC wrote: ↑01 Nov 2022, 13:33Bit concerning of late given they used to be the benchmark on pitting.
They could just be taking their time due to being under no pressure.
Wasn't the issue that the Checo's wheel didn't come off properly?