
There's no persecution going on here. Mclaren has been the best car, and both Piastri and Norris have failed on a number of occasions to take advantage of that, though some of that is also just Max being unbelievably good and capitalizing on opportunities that few others could manage.
In free practice?Luscion wrote: ↑29 May 2025, 14:40FIA trialling steel skid blocks this weekend, one car per team will run it
https://www.motorsportweek.com/2025/05/ ... d_id=70109
i would assume so, cant imagine teams would be happy to have to run it during the raceAR3-GP wrote: ↑29 May 2025, 14:48In free practice?Luscion wrote: ↑29 May 2025, 14:40FIA trialling steel skid blocks this weekend, one car per team will run it
https://www.motorsportweek.com/2025/05/ ... d_id=70109
the article mentions potential need to increase ride height due to steel wear.... another chapter in the ride height sagaLuscion wrote: ↑29 May 2025, 15:00i would assume so, cant imagine teams would be happy to have to run it during the raceAR3-GP wrote: ↑29 May 2025, 14:48In free practice?Luscion wrote: ↑29 May 2025, 14:40FIA trialling steel skid blocks this weekend, one car per team will run it
https://www.motorsportweek.com/2025/05/ ... d_id=70109
Dominant, or consistant? Even though many people try to paint a picture that both drivers are incompetent and that the car is 2 seconds a lap better than everyone else.... Mclaren went all in into producing an allrounder which means the car is competitive and with far smaller drops in form than what other have produced, but not allways the best and certanly not without its problems.Cs98 wrote: ↑28 May 2025, 13:12Of course not. It's only 170 points in front after 8 races despite its two drivers regularly making mistakes and bottling wins. That's not dominance at all. In fact, it's only scoring 120% more points than the next 3 best teams. Those are rookie numbers, that needs to be at least 200% for it to be considered slightly dominant.
Acknowledging that they've built an amazing car is the opposite of trashing them. If the MCL39 continues the season how it started it will go down in history alongside the likes of RB19, W11, W04-W06, RB9, F2004, MP4/4 etc. In fact the results so far are better than several of those dominant cars. McLaren fans should be the first to recognize this and credit the team for the amazing job that they've done. But instead we get all this defensive posturing and mental gymnastics trying to avoid the D word, which is clearly applicable when you use a historical comparison. We'll see how it all shakes out in the end, but so far so dominant.proteus wrote: ↑29 May 2025, 17:13Dominant, or consistant? Even though many people try to paint a picture that both drivers are incompetent and that the car is 2 seconds a lap better than everyone else.... Mclaren went all in into producing an allrounder which means the car is competitive and with far smaller drops in form than what other have produced, but not allways the best and certanly not without its problems.Cs98 wrote: ↑28 May 2025, 13:12Of course not. It's only 170 points in front after 8 races despite its two drivers regularly making mistakes and bottling wins. That's not dominance at all. In fact, it's only scoring 120% more points than the next 3 best teams. Those are rookie numbers, that needs to be at least 200% for it to be considered slightly dominant.
RedBull has a car tuned in for one driver and his demand is a very radical, which makes hard for a no.2 to adapt and the car is great at certain tracks and useless at others.
Merc has a very capable car, but their tyre eating habit has returned and they also have a rookie driver.
Ferrari again botched a third of the season allready because they cant tune in their ride height jet. When being low, the car showed glimpses of its potential. Their driver lineup is made out by frustrated Charles and slow adopting Lewis.
So Mclaren has a double whammy of good car and good driver lineup. And the tally is logical.
Also, the same people that trash Mclaren and its drivers, would also trash if both drivers would take a 1-2 in all of the races so far. I like that the WDC is closer. If Max or anybody steals it, then so be it. Let the best man win.
The defensive fans are more fans of the drivers, and not the teams. Now accepting Norris and Piastri are worse than Verstappen is hard for many. That is where all this cope comes from. Anyways, calling it as it is won't work with some people. So why bother I guess.Cs98 wrote: ↑29 May 2025, 18:34Acknowledging that they've built an amazing car is the opposite of trashing them. If the MCL39 continues the season how it started it will go down in history alongside the likes of RB19, W11, W04-W06, RB9, F2004, MP4/4 etc. In fact the results so far are better than several of those dominant cars. McLaren fans should be the first to recognize this and credit the team for the amazing job that they've done. But instead we get all this defensive posturing and mental gymnastics trying to avoid the D word, which is clearly applicable when you use a historical comparison. We'll see how it all shakes out in the end, but so far so dominant.proteus wrote: ↑29 May 2025, 17:13Dominant, or consistant? Even though many people try to paint a picture that both drivers are incompetent and that the car is 2 seconds a lap better than everyone else.... Mclaren went all in into producing an allrounder which means the car is competitive and with far smaller drops in form than what other have produced, but not allways the best and certanly not without its problems.Cs98 wrote: ↑28 May 2025, 13:12
Of course not. It's only 170 points in front after 8 races despite its two drivers regularly making mistakes and bottling wins. That's not dominance at all. In fact, it's only scoring 120% more points than the next 3 best teams. Those are rookie numbers, that needs to be at least 200% for it to be considered slightly dominant.
RedBull has a car tuned in for one driver and his demand is a very radical, which makes hard for a no.2 to adapt and the car is great at certain tracks and useless at others.
Merc has a very capable car, but their tyre eating habit has returned and they also have a rookie driver.
Ferrari again botched a third of the season allready because they cant tune in their ride height jet. When being low, the car showed glimpses of its potential. Their driver lineup is made out by frustrated Charles and slow adopting Lewis.
So Mclaren has a double whammy of good car and good driver lineup. And the tally is logical.
Also, the same people that trash Mclaren and its drivers, would also trash if both drivers would take a 1-2 in all of the races so far. I like that the WDC is closer. If Max or anybody steals it, then so be it. Let the best man win.
I don’t get involved with the dominance chat- it’s already dominating the threadCs98 wrote: ↑29 May 2025, 18:34Acknowledging that they've built an amazing car is the opposite of trashing them. If the MCL39 continues the season how it started it will go down in history alongside the likes of RB19, W11, W04-W06, RB9, F2004, MP4/4 etc. In fact the results so far are better than several of those dominant cars. McLaren fans should be the first to recognize this and credit the team for the amazing job that they've done. But instead we get all this defensive posturing and mental gymnastics trying to avoid the D word, which is clearly applicable when you use a historical comparison. We'll see how it all shakes out in the end, but so far so dominant.proteus wrote: ↑29 May 2025, 17:13Dominant, or consistant? Even though many people try to paint a picture that both drivers are incompetent and that the car is 2 seconds a lap better than everyone else.... Mclaren went all in into producing an allrounder which means the car is competitive and with far smaller drops in form than what other have produced, but not allways the best and certanly not without its problems.Cs98 wrote: ↑28 May 2025, 13:12
Of course not. It's only 170 points in front after 8 races despite its two drivers regularly making mistakes and bottling wins. That's not dominance at all. In fact, it's only scoring 120% more points than the next 3 best teams. Those are rookie numbers, that needs to be at least 200% for it to be considered slightly dominant.
RedBull has a car tuned in for one driver and his demand is a very radical, which makes hard for a no.2 to adapt and the car is great at certain tracks and useless at others.
Merc has a very capable car, but their tyre eating habit has returned and they also have a rookie driver.
Ferrari again botched a third of the season allready because they cant tune in their ride height jet. When being low, the car showed glimpses of its potential. Their driver lineup is made out by frustrated Charles and slow adopting Lewis.
So Mclaren has a double whammy of good car and good driver lineup. And the tally is logical.
Also, the same people that trash Mclaren and its drivers, would also trash if both drivers would take a 1-2 in all of the races so far. I like that the WDC is closer. If Max or anybody steals it, then so be it. Let the best man win.
It comes across as a vendetta ( I am not saying it is, but I do notice as a neutral party), because the truth is you cannot do much better than making the podium and the two McLaren drivers have done so, and are probably on to break the record for team podiums over a season. They don't need to win by a minute or 10 miles. They can podium with Max behind or not on the podium at all, which they have in Monaco. They have been doing fine for a team with two top drivers. It's going much better than any team have managed with two drivers with equal opportunity to be champion as far as I can remember. We cannot measure McLaren by the same standard as a team with a "chosen one" and a lap dog second driver. Lando poled and won in Monaco, yet he is receiving criticism for not being more dominant doing it. I don't get it.Seanspeed wrote: ↑29 May 2025, 13:58There's no persecution going on here. Mclaren has been the best car, and both Piastri and Norris have failed on a number of occasions to take advantage of that, though some of that is also just Max being unbelievably good and capitalizing on opportunities that few others could manage.
It's an entirely reasonable take, and frankly, the only reasonable one if you ask me. This isn't about some vendetta against Mclaren drivers, just saying it like it is.
Sounds more like wishful thinking to me. The mclaren drivers usually race clean so a shunt between them is unlikely imoSieper wrote: ↑29 May 2025, 14:16My prediction for the race: the two Mercedes powered championship contenders from the same team tangle with eachother in the first lap and both end up in the gravel. Max is being chased by Kimi the entire race but keeps him at bay and wins his first, erm, sixtysixth race.