RB VCARB 03

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
FW17
173
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: RB VCARB 03

Post

Image

vorticism
vorticism
377
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20
Location: YooEssay

Re: RB VCARB 03

Post

First sighting of floor stays in these regs.
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

Owen.C93
Owen.C93
178
Joined: 24 Jul 2010, 17:52

Re: RB VCARB 03

Post

Looks like the edge of the diffuser has some interesting details. Hard to see through the spray, but potentially some up flicks like the brake fairings used to have.
Motorsport Graduate in search of team experience ;)

User avatar
Giando
93
Joined: 10 Jan 2012, 17:56
Location: Milan (Italy)

Re: RB VCARB 03

Post

Is that a beam wing, sort of? Loophole found?

Image

pantherxxx
pantherxxx
6
Joined: 05 Jun 2018, 15:04
Location: Hungary

Re: RB VCARB 03

Post

The packaging looks very compact here, given how much of the floor is visible at the back. Much narrower than Haas. Hopefully the Red Bull-Ford engine will be fine if they managed to make it this compact.

vorticism
vorticism
377
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20
Location: YooEssay

Re: RB VCARB 03

Post

Giando wrote:
20 Jan 2026, 17:09
Is that a beam wing, sort of? Loophole found?

https://i.ibb.co/Q5Gfw1x/Screenshot-202 ... -36-36.png
Rear wing stay. A small single-element airfoil profile is permitted there to locate the endplates. It looks big there because it's blending in with the suspension arms.
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

User avatar
Giando
93
Joined: 10 Jan 2012, 17:56
Location: Milan (Italy)

Re: RB VCARB 03

Post

vorticism wrote:
20 Jan 2026, 17:23
Giando wrote:
20 Jan 2026, 17:09
Is that a beam wing, sort of? Loophole found?

https://i.ibb.co/Q5Gfw1x/Screenshot-202 ... -36-36.png
Rear wing stay. A small single-element airfoil profile is permitted there to locate the endplates. It looks big there because it's blending in with the suspension arms.
Ok clear. Thanks!

Nickel
Nickel
9
Joined: 02 Jun 2011, 18:10
Location: London Mountain, BC

Re: RB VCARB 03

Post

Is it just me or does that airbox look gargantuan?

edu2703
edu2703
33
Joined: 03 Jun 2015, 23:47
Location: Brazil

Re: RB VCARB 03

Post

Nickel wrote:
20 Jan 2026, 17:59
Is it just me or does that airbox look gargantuan?
Image

User avatar
prox
1
Joined: 29 Aug 2019, 13:08

Re: RB VCARB 03

Post

Cassius wrote:
20 Jan 2026, 14:14
Does it look like a significant high-rake design has been reintroduced?
The car will look higher than normal as its on full wets

User avatar
FW17
173
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: RB VCARB 03

Post

edu2703 wrote:
20 Jan 2026, 18:03
Nickel wrote:
20 Jan 2026, 17:59
Is it just me or does that airbox look gargantuan?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G_HlphIWQAI ... name=large
not much larger than STR 10

Image

They had put one of the ERS cooler on the sides of the fuel tank, others had done on top of the intake manifold
Image

Badger
Badger
12
Joined: 22 Sep 2025, 17:00

Re: RB VCARB 03

Post


User avatar
BorisTheBlade
40
Joined: 21 Nov 2008, 11:15

Re: RB VCARB 03

Post

Emag wrote:
20 Jan 2026, 15:39
As for cooling, I don't see this as a surprise because many technical people had already anticipated that the 2026 cars, as they were described, had more challenging cooling requirements compared to the last gen. The RedBull livery render broke that expectation because it had both slim sidepods and a slim centerline, however we don't know if that's a real car or not.
Honest question: What is the reasoning behind this stance?
As I see it, Thermal Efficiency of the ICE should be one of the highest priorities on everyone's list in order to maximize usable power and energy recovery for the max. 833 KW provided. The same goes for the whole electrical part, which should be well above 90% TE for recovery as well as supply. So there is not a lot of heat to be produced by the latter one.
What else is there that should require lots of cooling?
I would rather suspect, that centre line cooling does not cost a lot of already much less RW downforce, while giving you design freedom for the sidepods in order to work the floor as good as you can.

Seanspeed
Seanspeed
6
Joined: 20 Feb 2019, 20:12

Re: RB VCARB 03

Post

Emag wrote:
20 Jan 2026, 15:39
however the general sidepod shape + inlet is quite similar to the renders.
Image

Image

Sidepods are definitely different.

EDIT: ah geez, are those site ads showing up on my photos for everybody else, too? Really need to find a better place for image hosting I guess. smh

EDIT2: Based on newer pics, perhaps sidepods are actually the same. Looked steeper in the angle of the photo above, but not so elsewhere.
Last edited by Seanspeed on 20 Jan 2026, 19:40, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
FW17
173
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: RB VCARB 03

Post

BorisTheBlade wrote:
20 Jan 2026, 18:37
Emag wrote:
20 Jan 2026, 15:39
As for cooling, I don't see this as a surprise because many technical people had already anticipated that the 2026 cars, as they were described, had more challenging cooling requirements compared to the last gen. The RedBull livery render broke that expectation because it had both slim sidepods and a slim centerline, however we don't know if that's a real car or not.
Honest question: What is the reasoning behind this stance?
As I see it, Thermal Efficiency of the ICE should be one of the highest priorities on everyone's list in order to maximize usable power and energy recovery for the max. 833 KW provided. The same goes for the whole electrical part, which should be well above 90% TE for recovery as well as supply. So there is not a lot of heat to be produced by the latter one.
What else is there that should require lots of cooling?
I would rather suspect, that centre line cooling does not cost a lot of already much less RW downforce, while giving you design freedom for the sidepods in order to work the floor as good as you can.
The battery and control electronics which has to charge and discharge at 350kw almost the entire duration of the race

regulations dont allow for phase change cooling, maybe would have been more efficient than water cooling.