I don't want to make Principessa jealous.
And of course that is the only reason that the room is not booked.
In my board I introduced such a simple thing as 'type 4 random numbers' in the registration form. Exactly 4 and numbers only. Not a single bot managed to register with that for almost 2 years. It stopped them dead. Not sure if this is easy to do with phpBB.richard_leeds wrote: Not sure if the bots are programmed to deal with that sort of approach?
The thread name is what amused me. I learned to avoid the topics with words like 'nike' and 'iPhone' in the title. With that one, I honestly thought it was a question from some student, I though 'wut? hm.. that must be some new engineering term'Giblet wrote:I'm all for full frontal nudity, but penis in ass is not what I come to this site for.
Indeed, hence I replaced the CAPTCHA with a fairly simple question.nosh wrote:it doesnt seem to be working. half the posts on the latest post thingos are all spam. someone needs to spam the spammers.
tk421 wrote:I'm just curious here, but I haven't experienced any of these problems...I basically have no idea what you all are talking about; does anyone know why that might be?
Just a bit dumbfounded!
Thanks!
I wonder if you have stats to monitor the number of registrations that fail the simple question?Tomba wrote:The silence in this thread says quite a lot really
So far the anti-spam measures appear to be working fine... sssst
You can just log out and go to the registration page just to check it outrichard_leeds wrote:I wonder if you have stats to monitor the number of registrations that fail the simple question?Tomba wrote:The silence in this thread says quite a lot really
So far the anti-spam measures appear to be working fine... sssst
Whet is the simple question? It's tempting to register a new profile just to see the changes you've made