It looks incredible. I hope it stays the same.
It looks incredible. I hope it stays the same.
Worth noting..organic wrote: ↑13 Feb 2025, 19:17I thought the key quote was this:Emag wrote: ↑13 Feb 2025, 19:08McLaren made 'aggressive and fundamental' changes to its title-winning F1 car
But ultimately, we actually went for a relatively challenging approach in terms of how much innovation is in this car. This is predominantly to gain aerodynamic efficiency. At the same time, we still wanted to make some improvements in terms of interaction with the tyres, and what you can do to improve long-run pace."
Forget the messy "camo" patterns, they are required to hold back their actual 2025 livery until the official launch next Tuesday.
BMMR61 wrote: ↑13 Feb 2025, 23:26Forget the messy "camo" patterns, they are required to hold back their actual 2025 livery until the official launch next Tuesday.
For all the 'not anything radically different' I (for once) disagree. The immediate at a glance distinguishing point is the airbox. Then there's the much much straighter sidepod profile - looks like this could be a very effective and less draggy feature. The front suspension is really different. It looks like the chassis has been made more compact to allow for the aero shapes shown. The wings are straight off the MCL38 but these are just part of a parts list which may (probably) or may not even be in the 2025 spec sheet.
Let's hope with confidence that McLaren will hit the ground running with the car out of the blocks, unlike its two predecessors. To have a very sharply evolved car this early is exciting.
Interesting, I expected this would be the case. It is still frustratingly unclear (to me, at least), where these synergies may lie. My guess is that a lot of the learning around underbody downforce and side pod flow conditioning will carry over.mwillems wrote: ↑13 Feb 2025, 21:35Worth noting..organic wrote: ↑13 Feb 2025, 19:17I thought the key quote was this:Emag wrote: ↑13 Feb 2025, 19:08McLaren made 'aggressive and fundamental' changes to its title-winning F1 car
But ultimately, we actually went for a relatively challenging approach in terms of how much innovation is in this car. This is predominantly to gain aerodynamic efficiency. At the same time, we still wanted to make some improvements in terms of interaction with the tyres, and what you can do to improve long-run pace."
The team had previously (recently) stated that they found Synergy between the 25 and 26 regs and that they focused on these areas to get some 26 learning done.
Yeah, will be interesting to see more of the car and understand.mythr-ran-dire wrote: ↑15 Feb 2025, 06:31Interesting, I expected this would be the case. It is still frustratingly unclear (to me, at least), where these synergies may lie. My guess is that a lot of the learning around underbody downforce and side pod flow conditioning will carry over.
Also, the start of another annual ritual lurking in these forums learning about the cars and teams from everyone here. I have missed this very much.
The, "approximately half a second", is an estimation made from the article writer, however I am not so sure that is a correct assessment. The first couple of races (before the Miami package), the MCL38 was not an impressive car by any means. So, if Andrea really said the MCL39 is a step forward equivalent to ALL of last season's upgrades, which would include the Miami package, then if that actually translates on track, it could definitely be more than half a second.According to the McLaren team principal, the MCL39 is a step forward equivalent to all of last season’s upgrades – so approximately half a second.
Pretty sure the Ferrari "1s in the simulator" rumor is an annual tradition over there.Emag wrote: ↑17 Feb 2025, 17:03Well, it really depends on what the competition is doing. For example, rumors from Ferrari were saying they gained 1s in in the simulator, but Ferrari winter rumors are very unreliable. Half a second is good given the restricted nature of the regulation + this being the last year of these ruleset, but it only remains good until someone manages to find even more.