Thunders wrote:Ok then Apologies, i clearly got Post wrong.
Impossible.
Thunders wrote:Merc may have their little Secrets in how to do specific things but in General they work pretty similar. It's for the others to find the optimal Solution for their Package. Blatantly copying Merc can go horribly wrong. I don't know who was quoted with that "Merc Secret" Phrase but like gruntguru said i guess it has more to do with Internal Combustion characteristics than some big Piece Honda has overlooked until now.
I think that, apart from having an exellent PU overall in tandem with the perfect match in gasoline, the key factor is adaptability.
They're just great as a team when rolling out.
What we need to understand is that every GP is a project and every single project has its rollout. They are implementing every single time, and they are better at it than the rest. Clearly superior.
How they have dealt with testing gives us a good measure of how good they are at it. They are amazingly good. They need less time to tackle problems, can run way longer and have the best on-track car availability by a big margin.
They have a very good infrastructure, by all means. I keep insisting, they must have a very solid software backbone to be that good at workflows. These PU cannot work well without it, no matter how important combustion is technically, you must manage a team to get this right every time, standarize, lean the protocols and keep the information in order to progress.