Actually it makes a lot of sense that the MGUH couldn't power the MGUK with pure harvesting, haven't really thought of that before. So peak efficiency should be around 56 or so %, that seems more reasonable.wuzak wrote: ↑20 Jan 2026, 04:53The 1,000hp includes power (up to160hp) from the battery system, so should not be included in the TE calculation.johnnycesup wrote: ↑20 Jan 2026, 03:53Just to add to the previous discussion, using a common LHV for gasoline (44.3MJ/kg), the previous ruleset had a total fuel energy flow of 1230kW. If the 1000hp rumours are true, that would be a total thermal efficiency of 60,6%, which is pretty incredible.
TE would be around 51%, assuming all power for the MGUK comes from the battery.
It would be ~56% if about half the energy comes from the MGUH to MGUK.
But didn't the maximum power occur when the MGUH was being powered by the battery, and not recovering energy?
As for max power, what difference does driving the compressor with the MGUH makes? Genuine question, since the ICE will be providing plenty of air to spin the turbine. Is it a back pressure reduction, and if so, how significant is it?
