Possibly damaged floor too in Q3.
Alonso in Q1 did a 1:26.108, Lance did a 1:26.504. Then Alonso did 1:25.593 in Q2.
People who complain about Alonso being old/washed etc need their heads examined. He is crushing it with the car he has.
Possibly damaged floor too in Q3.
Agree.FNTC wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 22:17Possibly damaged floor too in Q3.
Alonso in Q1 did a 1:26.108, Lance did a 1:26.504. Then Alonso did 1:25.593 in Q2.
People who complain about Alonso being old/washed etc need their heads examined. He is crushing it with the car he has.
i think its slow compared to where we all want them to be. its a mile ahead of where they were a few races ago. and its a lot easier to watch than it was up until IMOLA. thank god we havent had to watch them bring downgrades again this season.Sedaxel wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 23:04Agree.
I think the car is just slow. It's improving, that's true. But it's still slow. Alo is doing a fantastic job, as he's always did.
I agree that Q1 and Q2 were very good, as I said, no doubt. But I think the comparisons with one of the worst drivers of the grid are useless. Same for RUS this year, gets a lot of praise, but come on, ANT is nowhere and therefore no real comparison, this guy sits in the Merc seat way too early..FNTC wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 22:17Possibly damaged floor too in Q3.
Alonso in Q1 did a 1:26.108, Lance did a 1:26.504. Then Alonso did 1:25.593 in Q2.
People who complain about Alonso being old/washed etc need their heads examined. He is crushing it with the car he has.
Agreed, I think the only way RBR comes to Silverstone with the config they have is with a SIM. Also the improvements RBR keep making on Saturday over Friday is because of the SIM.