I know, The rads for the intercooler are usually in the sidepods. Thus my point still stands, if they can run hotter they don't need as much cooling, and that has aerodynamic benefits.
I know, The rads for the intercooler are usually in the sidepods. Thus my point still stands, if they can run hotter they don't need as much cooling, and that has aerodynamic benefits.
As I quoted earlier, Charles chose to run those specific brakes. Unless he lied to the press, he is predominately to blame.catent wrote: ↑18 Jun 2026, 15:37I would ask you to do the following thought experiment: If Hamilton lazily slid into the wall under the same circumstances, and he indicated the rear brakes did not work as they should have, would you also deem such an incident ‘driver error’?
I suppose only you truly know the answer to that question, but I think it’s rather clear the answer to my hypothetical would be ‘no’, had the driver involved been named ‘Hamilton’.
It all depends on what context the Hp numbers were given. For example maybe the intercooler by itself is only with 5HP, but when the new fuel is included it's worth 10 to 15HP etc.
Even if that is the case. It's the team's responsibility to give a driver a functioning car. Not that I see how breaking the front wing would cause a failure like this. We must have seen a hundred crashes that are like this or worse in a year, without anyone having a hydraulics failure.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑16 Jun 2026, 23:46Single point of failure system - if the steering system leaks then the hydraulic system leaks. It's one system for steering, gears, etc., and the rear portion of the braking system controlled by the car (hydraulically).