2026 Hybrid Powerunits

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
User avatar
peewon
5
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 03:11

Re: 2026 Hybrid Powerunits

Post

diffuser wrote:
17 Apr 2026, 22:11


It also spins up the compressor at low rpm to boost ICE power.
This remind me that Ferrari actually went to the FIA last year to warn them about the start without MGU-H and were ignored so they built their PU to account for that, only for Mercedes to start complaining once the season started and then immediately a change was brought in.

gearboxtrouble
gearboxtrouble
11
Joined: 17 Jan 2026, 19:17

Re: 2026 Hybrid Powerunits

Post

diffuser wrote:
18 Apr 2026, 16:39
gearboxtrouble wrote:
17 Apr 2026, 14:11
diffuser wrote:
17 Apr 2026, 06:12


Even without any improvements in energy recovery relative to 2025, the system could harvest on the order of 1 MJ during a full-throttle straight. Applying a one-third reduction to account for the lower ICE output expected in 2026 still yields approximately 0.67 MJ, equivalent to ~2 seconds of MGU-K deployment at maximum power down the same straight. Even when the battery is completely depleted, it could directly drive the MGU-K with about 100MJ/130HP while the ICE is at full throttle.

Extrapolated over a full lap, this corresponds to roughly 4 MJ of recoverable energy, which translates to ~12 seconds of additional 350 kW (≈470 hp) MGU-K deployment. That's something.
Imho 12s a lap of extra full throttle seems a tad too optimistic and even if it was realistic we'd still only cover 20-40% of the full throttle time around a lap. Would it help with the current formula? yes. Would it be the solution that fixes it? absolutely not. You're still left with 550-580 hp ICEs for most of the lap and thats the biggest driver of all of the main problems with this ruleset from the yo yo overtakes to the closing speeds to the sacrifice of cornering performance to boost harvesting. The problem remains energy starvation from the lack of energy input. At this stage, adding a spec MGU-H would be too complex, costly and provide far too little extra energy. The only realistic fix doable by 2027 is to boost the ICE to at least 75% of the 1000hp target and lower the MGU-K by 60% to ensure that brake energy alone is all that is needed to have full power available nearly all the time. A 750hp ICE would require a fuel flow boost and some material but manageable changes to the internals, turbo and chassis to handle the extra fuel - something modders do to their cars every day.
I started talking about the MGU-H because we’ve begun to see a rethinking of it in production cars and motorcycles. The latest iteration is a three-cylinder Honda motorcycle engine. I thought it was a shame that arguably the most famous Formula 1 innovation was removed from the formula. My argument was never that it was the solution to our current woes, although it clearly wouldn’t hurt.
Fair. I agree it was the one engine innovation F1 perfected in the last ruleset though iirc it was BMW who first created a road car with a prototype triple turbo 3.0 inline 6 diesel with a MGUH in the early 2000s. My guess is we'll see a lot more of this as euro 7 regs bite to help make back the power lost from the lamba one regs. The rumor is the next Porsche 911 GT3 will be forced to abandon the glorious 4.0 NA flat 6 for some sort of electrically turbocharged 3.6 engine tuned to rev to the moon.

User avatar
hollus
Moderator
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 01:21
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: 2026 Hybrid Powerunits

Post

peewon wrote:
18 Apr 2026, 16:46
diffuser wrote:
17 Apr 2026, 22:11


It also spins up the compressor at low rpm to boost ICE power.
This remind me that Ferrari actually went to the FIA last year to warn them about the start without MGU-H and were ignored so they built their PU to account for that, only for Mercedes to start complaining once the season started and then immediately a change was brought in.
That maybe a convenient narrative, but the Macca's started every bit as good as the Ferraris in the last race. Sounds more like learnings taken than inherent hardware limitations.
Dunning asked: Do you know, Kruger? Kruger said: Yes.

Farnborough
Farnborough
148
Joined: 18 Mar 2023, 14:15

Re: 2026 Hybrid Powerunits

Post

hollus wrote:
18 Apr 2026, 21:58
peewon wrote:
18 Apr 2026, 16:46
diffuser wrote:
17 Apr 2026, 22:11


It also spins up the compressor at low rpm to boost ICE power.
This remind me that Ferrari actually went to the FIA last year to warn them about the start without MGU-H and were ignored so they built their PU to account for that, only for Mercedes to start complaining once the season started and then immediately a change was brought in.
That maybe a convenient narrative, but the Macca's started every bit as good as the Ferraris in the last race. Sounds more like learnings taken than inherent hardware limitations.
Haven't McLaren taken a low first gear ratio too in expectation of this eventuality ?

The effect of getting the clutch fully closed (released and fully driving the gearbox) at that track speed, will allow wider throttle opening and earlier pressure build in compressor to raise torque.

Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
667
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: 2026 Hybrid Powerunits

Post

gearboxtrouble wrote:
18 Apr 2026, 18:16
diffuser wrote:
18 Apr 2026, 16:39
I started talking about the MGU-H because we’ve begun to see a rethinking of it in production cars and motorcycles. The latest iteration is a three-cylinder Honda motorcycle engine. I thought it was a shame that arguably the most famous Formula 1 innovation was removed from the formula. My argument was never that it was the solution to our current woes, although it clearly wouldn’t hurt.
Fair. I agree it was the one engine innovation F1 perfected in the last ruleset though iirc it was BMW who first created a road car with a prototype triple turbo 3.0 inline 6 diesel with a MGUH in the early 2000s. My guess is we'll see a lot more of this as euro 7 regs bite to help make back the power lost from the lamba one regs. The rumor is the next Porsche 911 GT3 will be forced to abandon the glorious 4.0 NA flat 6 for some sort of electrically turbocharged 3.6 engine tuned to rev to the moon.
a part-time electrically assisted turbocharger (or electrically-driven supercharger) isn't really an MGU-H

an MGU-H isn't cheap and it isn't a goldmine ....
the recovered energy will be very small if the CR/ER is high and the fueling is lean
that's why the recovered energy was large in the Wright Turbo-Compound (and the efficiency unbeaten for 50 years)

supercharging (& assisted-charge NA) were first available in 'over-the-counter' cars (and aeroplanes) 100 years ago
and already dominant in car racing on both sides of the Atlantic
in 100 years there has not been a textbook claiming better efficiency at high % power (eg for turbocharged SI engines)
despite the NA engines apparent obligation to eschew knock sensing and good quality fuel and charge cooling

exhaust-driven supercharging was adopted only for convenience
GM road cars (Chevrolet Corvair and Pontiac Tempest) started this in 1959
the owners having to buy the necessary water/methanol fluid from the dealers

User avatar
peewon
5
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 03:11

Re: 2026 Hybrid Powerunits

Post

hollus wrote:
18 Apr 2026, 21:58
peewon wrote:
18 Apr 2026, 16:46
diffuser wrote:
17 Apr 2026, 22:11


It also spins up the compressor at low rpm to boost ICE power.
This remind me that Ferrari actually went to the FIA last year to warn them about the start without MGU-H and were ignored so they built their PU to account for that, only for Mercedes to start complaining once the season started and then immediately a change was brought in.
That maybe a convenient narrative, but the Macca's started every bit as good as the Ferraris in the last race. Sounds more like learnings taken than inherent hardware limitations.
The change was made to the start procedure after it was apparent in Barcelona that the Ferrari PUs with its smaller turbo were quicker off the blocks. George Russell had a moan about it in the press and then they added the pre start 5 second delay thing so others could spool their turbos which nullified Ferrari's advantage. All this after Ferrari went to FIA with problem, were ignored and designed their turbos smaller compromising performance over a race distance for better starts. What am I missing?

User avatar
hollus
Moderator
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 01:21
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: 2026 Hybrid Powerunits

Post

And without those 5 seconds Macca would not have started as well as the Ferrari. That's the story line? And we know this how? It is only those 5 seconds making Ferrari not rule the world? What am I missing?

The everything Mercedes is shady, everything Mercedes is cheaty, Mercedes has everyone and everything in their pockets... it is a tiresome narrative. And with so many spaguetti thrown at that wall, sure there must be some truth to some of it, but everything, everywhere, all the time? Come on.

This particular flavor of Mercedes cheating, ejem, lobbying itself into an advantage, is only one side of the narrative you are pushing. I am just replying to this one side: If the Maccas can start equally to the Ferraris now, it -probably- could start equally also without that five second difference. So -likely- not a hardware limitation. Which is what you claim the 5 seconds rescued Mercedes out of.

I am not a Mercedes fan, far from it, but the Star Wars analogies do not convince me that they are Darth Vader and the Emperor combined. And we all know how that story ended!
Dunning asked: Do you know, Kruger? Kruger said: Yes.