gearboxtrouble wrote: ↑18 Apr 2026, 18:16
diffuser wrote: ↑18 Apr 2026, 16:39
I started talking about the MGU-H because we’ve begun to see a rethinking of it in production cars and motorcycles. The latest iteration is a three-cylinder Honda motorcycle engine. I thought it was a shame that arguably the most famous Formula 1 innovation was removed from the formula. My argument was never that it was the solution to our current woes, although it clearly wouldn’t hurt.
Fair. I agree it was the one engine innovation F1 perfected in the last ruleset though iirc it was BMW who first created a road car with a prototype triple turbo 3.0 inline 6 diesel with a MGUH in the early 2000s. My guess is we'll see a lot more of this as euro 7 regs bite to help make back the power lost from the lamba one regs. The rumor is the next Porsche 911 GT3 will be forced to abandon the glorious 4.0 NA flat 6 for some sort of electrically turbocharged 3.6 engine tuned to rev to the moon.
a part-time electrically assisted turbocharger (or electrically-driven supercharger) isn't really an MGU-H
an MGU-H isn't cheap and it isn't a goldmine ....
the recovered energy will be very small if the CR/ER is high and the fueling is lean
that's why the recovered energy was large in the Wright Turbo-Compound (and the efficiency unbeaten for 50 years)
supercharging (& assisted-charge NA) were first available in 'over-the-counter' cars (and aeroplanes) 100 years ago
and already dominant in car racing on both sides of the Atlantic
in 100 years there has not been a textbook claiming better efficiency at high % power (eg for turbocharged SI engines)
despite the NA engines apparent obligation to eschew knock sensing and good quality fuel and charge cooling
exhaust-driven supercharging was adopted only for convenience
GM road cars (Chevrolet Corvair and Pontiac Tempest) started this in 1959
the owners having to buy the necessary water/methanol fluid from the dealers