last race Leclerc even changed to a newer sepecification under parc fermé, without a penalty. It needs stewards' approval, but seems to be no issue at all.
last race Leclerc even changed to a newer sepecification under parc fermé, without a penalty. It needs stewards' approval, but seems to be no issue at all.
I missed that one, but it is really weird they allowed it. Different specification part is normally a pit lane start. It you allow a different engine, why not a different wing....
Yes I feel the same. Otherwise it is a risky move. Not being able to help Lewis might cost them the win, and first vs second is seven points, same difference as e.g. 6 vs 10th position for Max. So Bottas would need to do a really good job at holding up Max to give a benefit.djones wrote: ↑26 Sep 2021, 10:28This talk of them giving BOT the penalty on purpose seems ridiculous to me.
I suspect he genuinely had an issue they were worried about.
If all they wanted him to do was drop back places and slow VER down he could have done that from from the front and just let people past.
My prediction for the race:
NOR
RIC
SAI
HAM will DNF with engine issues.
Not a million miles away! A great qualifying session, the race is going to be very interesting at the start (Russia always is, due to the slipstream to T2). Could be fantastic, could be carnage. What is the short-range forecast for the race?Stu wrote: ↑25 Sep 2021, 12:10Williams to gamble & fit a big rear wing for wet qualifying and pick up a win…..piast9 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2021, 11:53I hope that they realized that it was a mistake, not setting a precedent...Restomaniac wrote: ↑25 Sep 2021, 11:47Remember Spa and how they set a precedent? Be ready for another possible 3 lap circus.
No it doesn't make sense at all indeed. Its not like Bottas is close to Verstappen so why the extra engine would make such a difference I don't know.JordanMugen wrote: ↑26 Sep 2021, 10:31I don't follow why that would be the case. That does not make sense.