Ford is killing it in EV's right?Wouter wrote: ↑08 Feb 2026, 12:17.Henk_v wrote: ↑08 Feb 2026, 10:35.Chuckjr wrote: ↑06 Feb 2026, 09:42
.
Fwiw, and hopefully this eases your concern, Henk, but as far as I know, Ford really does not have a huge roll in this, and furthermore, there's no flys on Ford. They are an astute asset, and imo, will only help the RB cause. Honda may have some solid state or some kind of advanced battery tech that may be advantageous. Ford and Honda have plenty of experience in high level F1, so they have that going for them...which is nice. I do think RB will be fine, and will provide what is needed for Max to be at the sharp end provided they have also advantaged the whole compression theory--if it exists. I'm still undecided about that whole thing. Hoffman has made some good counter points to it, so we will see I guess. But yeah, I think RB will be fine.
Ford was introduced as a naming-partner and would "support" on the electric side. I do not overestimate their role.
Ford has not been well known for their electrification, to put it mildly.
All talk about the contributions of Ford sound like marketing bullshit. Their contribution is in their wallet.
Any historical ford F1 association was non-hybrid by companies Ford aquired.
Ford is working for Red Bull on the electric part of the PU.
Ford has the in-house expertise to develop the electrical components itself.
What Ford can do does.
Electric motors & drivetrains
Ford has its own engineers, test centers, and production lines for:
- Electric motor design (stator/rotor, windings, cooling)
- Power electronics (inverters)
- Complete e-drive units (motor + reduction gear + electronics)
This takes place in, among others:
- Van Dyke Electric Powertrain Center (US)
- Irapuato (Mexico)
- Halewood (UK)
These are not assembly plants, but full-fledged development and production sites.
Ford can independently design, test, and produce an electric motor and drivetrain.
Battery systems (but not always the cells)
Ford has in-depth knowledge of:
- Battery architecture
- Thermal management
- BMS software
- Pack design and safety
What they usually don't do in-house:
- Battery cell chemistry (which is an extremely specialized field)
Almost no automakers do this themselves—even Tesla sources many cells externally.
Ford fully understands the technology, but sources cells because:
- It's cheaper
- Scale is crucial
- Suppliers have a 20+ year head start in this area
In this video, the most significant advantage mentioned is the physical proximity of the chassis and engine teams. Pip Clode, who is the Head of Mechanical Design, said that it is only a 5 minute walk from his desk to the chassis designers.lio007 wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026, 13:30Very interesting episode:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Az-lu5UqSs
It might not be AI but it’s hilarious nontheless. Next he will suggest the air is better over at Milton Keynes so that creates an advantage others wont be able to easily replicateBadger wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026, 21:35Stop posting AI slop in this thread, please.pantherxxx wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026, 21:11In this video, the most significant advantage mentioned is the physical proximity of the chassis and engine teams. Pip Clode, who is the Head of Mechanical Design, said that it is only a 5 minute walk from his desk to the chassis designers.lio007 wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026, 13:30Very interesting episode:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Az-lu5UqSs
This actually confirms that the integration has allowed for a kind of radical packaging that the rivals, who may be spread out in different countries or factories, cannot easily copy. Even in the case of Mercedes, the chassic and engine guys in Brixworth and Brackley are 45 minutes away by car.
Chris Finister (Head of Systemsm Design) stated that despite the size of the 2026 cars, they have more electronics and wiring than ever before. Being able to walk up the road and "bug" the engine team to move an engine component allows them to get a level of "tightness" in the sidepods and bodywork that is aerodynamically efficient, and others can't easily replicate.
Did you watch the video? And stop lying, it's not ai, that's not my problem if you are paranoid.Badger wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026, 21:35Stop posting AI slop in this thread, please.pantherxxx wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026, 21:11In this video, the most significant advantage mentioned is the physical proximity of the chassis and engine teams. Pip Clode, who is the Head of Mechanical Design, said that it is only a 5 minute walk from his desk to the chassis designers.lio007 wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026, 13:30Very interesting episode:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Az-lu5UqSs
This actually confirms that the integration has allowed for a kind of radical packaging that the rivals, who may be spread out in different countries or factories, cannot easily copy. Even in the case of Mercedes, the chassic and engine guys in Brixworth and Brackley are 45 minutes away by car.
Chris Finister (Head of Systemsm Design) stated that despite the size of the 2026 cars, they have more electronics and wiring than ever before. Being able to walk up the road and "bug" the engine team to move an engine component allows them to get a level of "tightness" in the sidepods and bodywork that is aerodynamically efficient, and others can't easily replicate.
I literally highlighted what the engineers said in the video, and Ben Hodgkinson said the same thing btw, that it's a huge advantage. So if someone doesn't have time to watch the whole 1 hour video, these are the important parts. A simple thanks would have been enough.Emag wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026, 21:38It might not be AI but it’s hilarious nontheless. Next he will suggest the air is better over at Milton Keynes so that creates an advantage others wont be able to easily replicateBadger wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026, 21:35Stop posting AI slop in this thread, please.pantherxxx wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026, 21:11
In this video, the most significant advantage mentioned is the physical proximity of the chassis and engine teams. Pip Clode, who is the Head of Mechanical Design, said that it is only a 5 minute walk from his desk to the chassis designers.
This actually confirms that the integration has allowed for a kind of radical packaging that the rivals, who may be spread out in different countries or factories, cannot easily copy. Even in the case of Mercedes, the chassic and engine guys in Brixworth and Brackley are 45 minutes away by car.
Chris Finister (Head of Systemsm Design) stated that despite the size of the 2026 cars, they have more electronics and wiring than ever before. Being able to walk up the road and "bug" the engine team to move an engine component allows them to get a level of "tightness" in the sidepods and bodywork that is aerodynamically efficient, and others can't easily replicate.![]()
I personally dont think what you commented was AI. There have been some older ones where I am 100% certain AI was used but not for this one.pantherxxx wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026, 21:43I literally highlighted what the engineers said in the video, and Ben Hodgkinson said the same thing btw, that it's a huge advantage. So if someone doesn't have time to watch the whole 1 hour video, these are the important parts. A simple thanks would have been enough.
43:30 onwards was discussion about the weight of RB22. It sounds like they are overweight.lio007 wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026, 13:30Very interesting episode:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Az-lu5UqSs