machin wrote:It's worse than that: in IMSA they are BOP'ed up to a equal performance.
that's indeed an argument. With that in mind you can not take that thing serious.
But I still have sympathy to the Idea. What I really like is the fact that it can provide equal lap times with significant less fuel and tires. And before "machin" is pointing again at the power, weight, aero stuff etc. I know about the advantages and that it is no indication to a better concept.
But to remind how the concept was born... A while ago, when gas has become very expensive, the motorsport industry was nervous about its future. Bowlby was thinking about a solution reducing the aerodynamic drag of the car. He has understood that more than half the drag of an IndyCar was made by the front tires, so he pushed them together. It was an attempt reducing drag/fuel and that has been successfull to me.
If we want to know what kind of concept could be a good racecar, than we have to allow more technical freedom (btw, in early race days the Morgan Three Wheeler has been banned because it was outperforming all four wheeler). But more freedom rules is the opposite of what we see developing in the motorsport world.