Mclaren MCL40

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
johnnycesup
johnnycesup
4
Joined: 13 Sep 2024, 11:31

Re: Mclaren MCL40

Post

Owen.C93 wrote:
27 Feb 2026, 21:13

Technically the weight distribution isn't fixed, only the minimum weight on each axle. So if you're 5kg over weight on the rear of the car then you will have a more rearward weight distribution.
Well spotted, I misread the regulations, thanks!
markc wrote:
27 Feb 2026, 20:49
It's to try and stop a particular team from being lucky with weight distribution giving them an advantage because they land on the sweet spot, so mandated weight distribution removes this element.
As Owen.C93 explained (and I misunderstood), you can have weight dsitribution outside of that window, it just costs extra weight.

I disagree with your "lucky" weight distribution thing tho, teams should be able to adjust their own weight distribution to get a balance that better suits their own car. Is it not just as lucky if your car performs better in the prescribed (at the minimum weight) weight distribution?

User avatar
markc
4
Joined: 08 Dec 2011, 01:30

Re: Mclaren MCL40

Post

I'm certain there's been times in the past where a weight distribution has suited a particular team and they've "lucked into it", as it were. IE they created a car with a certain wheel base length for potentially packaging and aero reasons that hit a sweet spot with the weight distribution as well, which also happened to "turn" the tyres on. I believe that's the reason for the rule in the first place. Indeed there's been mandated weight distribution since at least 2011 (when Pirelli became the sole supplier)

For 2014 the rule was:
4.2 Weight distribution :
For 2014 only, the weight applied on the front and rear wheels must not be less than 311kg and 366kg respectively at all times during the qualifying practice session. If, when required for checking, a car is not already fitted with dry-weather tires, it will be weighed on a set of dry-weather tires selected by the FIA technical delegate."
For 2026 it's a factor of the min mass specified:
4.3 Mass distribution
With the car resting on a horizontal plane:
i. the mass measured at the front axle must not be less than the minimum mass specified
in Article 4.2 factored by 0.44.
ii. the mass measured at the rear axle must not be less than the minimum mass specified
in Article 4.2factored by 0.54.
If, when required for checking, a car is not already fitted with dry−weather tyres, its mass will
be determined using a set of dry−weather tyres selected by the FIA technical delegate.
If, when required for checking, a Heat Hazard has been declared, the increase in mass will not
be considered.
This is what I mean by lucking into the weight distro and how the rule seems to me to be there to mitigate against this...

Anyway this is not really an MCL40 specific thing, but car in general, but I sure hope McLaren have still got the tyres under them and working for them like they did last year! Although that's also a function of McLaren's heat management of those tyres too... (so many moving parts to F1, which is why its so fascinating to me!!)

On an aside: I'm also certain I've heard commentary on the subject over the years (no chance I can remember specifics, I'm afraid) which leads me to believe there was an element of luck before some limits were set in the rules on weight distro to remove, or at least smooth out the benefit.

User avatar
_cerber1
293
Joined: 18 Jan 2019, 21:50
Location: From Russia with love

Re: Mclaren MCL40

Post

Image

User avatar
AR3-GP
560
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Mclaren MCL40

Post

Melbourne (Albert Fabrega):

Image
Image
Image
Beware of T-Rex

User avatar
AR3-GP
560
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Mclaren MCL40

Post

I think this is new:

Image
Beware of T-Rex

User avatar
De Wet
18
Joined: 03 Jan 2024, 13:32

Re: Mclaren MCL40

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
05 Mar 2026, 10:54
I think this is new:

https://i.postimg.cc/7PNgnH7L/image.png

We had this in testing...

Image

User avatar
AR3-GP
560
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Mclaren MCL40

Post

De Wet wrote:
05 Mar 2026, 11:08
AR3-GP wrote:
05 Mar 2026, 10:54
I think this is new:

https://i.postimg.cc/7PNgnH7L/image.png

We had this in testing...

https://i127.fastpic.org/big/2026/0213/ ... 8a2563.jpg
It looks completely different now. In your picture the winglet is a single element connected to the beam wing. In the updated picture, the winglet is in front of the beam wing and has extra fins on the side.
Beware of T-Rex

SB15
SB15
7
Joined: 15 Feb 2025, 22:47

Re: Mclaren MCL40

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
05 Mar 2026, 10:54
I think this is new:

https://i.postimg.cc/7PNgnH7L/image.png
Absolutely love the sculpting on the rear wing!

User avatar
De Wet
18
Joined: 03 Jan 2024, 13:32

Re: Mclaren MCL40

Post

Image


Changes I have noticed. Looks like the Beam Wing (4) has a lower angle.

BigBeansBoy
BigBeansBoy
11
Joined: 16 Jul 2021, 17:37

Re: Mclaren MCL40

Post

De Wet wrote:
05 Mar 2026, 14:57
https://i.ibb.co/G4sb5wWQ/image.jpg


Changes I have noticed. Looks like the Beam Wing (4) has a lower angle.
1. Is the standard part from the FIA so it can’t have changed

User avatar
AR3-GP
560
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Mclaren MCL40

Post

----
Last edited by AR3-GP on 06 Mar 2026, 03:17, edited 1 time in total.
Beware of T-Rex

vorticism
vorticism
443
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20
Location: YooEssay

Re: Mclaren MCL40

Post

De Wet wrote:
05 Mar 2026, 11:08
AR3-GP wrote:
05 Mar 2026, 10:54
I think this is new:

https://i.postimg.cc/7PNgnH7L/image.png

We had this in testing...

https://i127.fastpic.org/big/2026/0213/ ... 8a2563.jpg
Very interesting to see this large center cannon. The opposite of what they had last year. MCL39 with the notably very small cooler efflux. Many implications:

-shorter cars force less optimal ducting?
-new PU format led to more radiator waste heat than before (less lost to exhaust, more to liquid cooling)? More ES/MGUK and ICE-gensetting, so this could be case.
-single conventional center cannon is better than supplementing with louvers
-some other unlooked aero benefit (narrow not always best)
-none of the above?
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

User avatar
AR3-GP
560
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Mclaren MCL40

Post

vorticism wrote:
05 Mar 2026, 16:44
De Wet wrote:
05 Mar 2026, 11:08
AR3-GP wrote:
05 Mar 2026, 10:54
I think this is new:

https://i.postimg.cc/7PNgnH7L/image.png

We had this in testing...

https://i127.fastpic.org/big/2026/0213/ ... 8a2563.jpg
Very interesting to see this large center cannon. The opposite of what they had last year. MCL39 with the notably very small cooler efflux. Many implications:

-shorter cars force less optimal ducting?
-new PU format led to more radiator waste heat than before (less lost to exhaust, more to liquid cooling)? More ES/MGUK and ICE-gensetting, so this could be case.
-single conventional center cannon is better than supplementing with louvers
-some other unlooked aero benefit (narrow not always best)
-none of the above?
They have tested an even larger one. The entire back of the car is open in this:

Image
Beware of T-Rex

Puffpirat
Puffpirat
1
Joined: 19 Jul 2022, 00:18

Re: Mclaren MCL40

Post

markc wrote:
01 Mar 2026, 21:55

For 2026 it's a factor of the min mass specified:
4.3 Mass distribution
With the car resting on a horizontal plane:
i. the mass measured at the front axle must not be less than the minimum mass specified
in Article 4.2 factored by 0.44.
ii. the mass measured at the rear axle must not be less than the minimum mass specified
in Article 4.2factored by 0.54.
If, when required for checking, a car is not already fitted with dry−weather tyres, its mass will
be determined using a set of dry−weather tyres selected by the FIA technical delegate.
If, when required for checking, a Heat Hazard has been declared, the increase in mass will not
be considered.
That rule still leaves 2% wiggle room so you can adjust the weight balance in that window without going overweight

Macklaren
Macklaren
14
Joined: 23 Feb 2014, 16:26

Re: Mclaren MCL40

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
05 Mar 2026, 10:54
Melbourne (Albert Fabrega):

Image
The shape of the winglet above WORKDAY is different than testing?