via PitpassBRDC president, Derek Warwick, has dismissed claims that the kerbing at Silverstone was to blame for the numerous, spectacular tyres failures during yesterday's Grand Prix.
"These kerbs have been in since 2009," he told Sky Sports. "We've had thousands and thousands of cars go over these kerbs and they have been absolutely fine.
"We've had them checked by the FIA and they comply completely," he added, admitting that at one stage he feared for the future of the event.
"We need to make sure it's a good race here at Silverstone in order to bring the crowds back for next year so to say I was panicking would be an under-statement.
"I think Bernie, the FIA and Pirelli are bringing the sport into disrepute," he continued, "and they need to have a serious look at themselves and change these tyres and not expect all the teams to agree. Take it out of the teams' hands and put safe tyres on these cars."
I was thinking the same, and wasn't it supposed that for this years tyres, the walls were "made" with different configuration, maybe the inner part more strong, and the outside "softer" but with the swapping, for performance reasons, that was not useful anymore?gilgen wrote:My reading of Pirelli statements says that cuts were not the cause of the exploding tyres.
A couple of weeks ago, there was debate about the tyres being swapped side to side. A close up photo of Massa's tyre remains, shows that the barcode label, on the left rear, is clearly marked R. If the tyres are manufactured with a bias in one direction, and this is reversed, for whatever reason, could this be putting extra strain on the bonding of the tread to the belt?
It was reported that Rosbergs tyre was starting to delaminate, with NO cuts apparent.
If that were the case, then Pirelli would have immediately told the press that the teams were at fault for using their tires incorrectly. But since that didn't happen, you can be sure that the problem is in the tire construction itself, either a design or a manufacturing error. Interestingly, many teams were shown adding air pressure to the tires when the safety car came out. I believe that the area where the contact surface meets the sidewall is the source of the problem (the same as before). Adding the Kevlar ply did not change the temperature coeficient in the shoulder, so the delamination problem was not solved; instead the Kevlar caused damage to the shoulder area (where the tread was now ancored) through the higher than expected/calculated centrifical forces, and tore that sensitive out with it, leading to the "new" failure mode.Poncho wrote:I was thinking the same, and wasn't it supposed that for this years tyres, the walls were "made" with different configuration, maybe the inner part more strong, and the outside "softer" but with the swapping, for performance reasons, that was not useful anymore?gilgen wrote:My reading of Pirelli statements says that cuts were not the cause of the exploding tyres.
A couple of weeks ago, there was debate about the tyres being swapped side to side. A close up photo of Massa's tyre remains, shows that the barcode label, on the left rear, is clearly marked R. If the tyres are manufactured with a bias in one direction, and this is reversed, for whatever reason, could this be putting extra strain on the bonding of the tread to the belt?
It was reported that Rosbergs tyre was starting to delaminate, with NO cuts apparent.
Yes, pirelli would have say that.CBeck113 wrote:If that were the case, then Pirelli would have immediately told the press that the teams were at fault for using their tires incorrectly. But since that didn't happen, you can be sure that the problem is in the tire construction itself, either a design or a manufacturing error. Interestingly, many teams were shown adding air pressure to the tires when the safety car came out. I believe that the area where the contact surface meets the sidewall is the source of the problem (the same as before). Adding the Kevlar ply did not change the temperature coeficient in the shoulder, so the delamination problem was not solved; instead the Kevlar caused damage to the shoulder area (where the tread was now ancored) through the higher than expected/calculated centrifical forces, and tore that sensitive out with it, leading to the "new" failure mode.Poncho wrote:I was thinking the same, and wasn't it supposed that for this years tyres, the walls were "made" with different configuration, maybe the inner part more strong, and the outside "softer" but with the swapping, for performance reasons, that was not useful anymore?gilgen wrote:My reading of Pirelli statements says that cuts were not the cause of the exploding tyres.
A couple of weeks ago, there was debate about the tyres being swapped side to side. A close up photo of Massa's tyre remains, shows that the barcode label, on the left rear, is clearly marked R. If the tyres are manufactured with a bias in one direction, and this is reversed, for whatever reason, could this be putting extra strain on the bonding of the tread to the belt?
It was reported that Rosbergs tyre was starting to delaminate, with NO cuts apparent.
But at least Mercedes will now receive a proper punishment (in my opinion at least). Can the teams or the FiA take action against Pirelli?
Sorry...You're wrong..The track as defined by the FIA is between the white lines.beelsebob wrote:They do drive on the track. The track is defined as all area in which you can have some part of tyre touching the white line.strad wrote:SO it once again proves my point that the drivers should be required to drive ON the track...If they cut a tire becuase they want to straightline a corner..too bad..
That said,,,I would have sworn I saw Massa run over somethuing just prior to his tire letting go.
So after however many decades of drivers happily and safely clipping kerbs in every open wheel and sportscar racing series (including years of F1 with more engine power and/or more open aero rues)... it's now that we should throw up our hands and say that riding the kerbs is too much?strad wrote:SO it once again proves my point that the drivers should be required to drive ON the track...If they cut a tire becuase they want to straightline a corner..too bad..
The bigger problem tends to be freeze and thaw, but no... Since we have these problems, we tend to design our roads (or circuits) to be able to cope with it. Plus, the curbs there look pretty much exactly what F1 curbs are meant to look like. I would be surprised if you found any circuit (bar street circuits off) that didn't have a "sharp" edge behind the curbs.tf1250 wrote:Hi guys,
First time post.
Could weather have played a part in causing the tire cuts? GB has had a very wet spring and water can cause settling. Wondering if differential settling between the curbs and 'green' concrete could be relatively recent?
You know that's not true. For many decades they had kurbs you dared not cut across...and then as with all things the car owners and designers pushed for lower kurbs and the drivers exploited it.So after however many decades of drivers happily and safely clipping kerbs in every open wheel and sportscar racing series (including years of F1 with more engine power and/or more open aero rues)... it's now that we should throw up our hands and say that riding the kerbs is too much?