It's pole, not a winpurestpurist wrote: ↑02 Aug 2025, 17:05SB15 wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 18:41I wish I had this much copiumSphere3758 wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 18:30I have a strange feeling of a Leclerc win this weekend. I know he doesnt have a great track record on this track but feel like he is going to hook it up in qualifying and defend with all his might in the race.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
the Sauber looked like the faster car so far this weekend, I'd say. But yeah, Verstappen will probably find another gear in the race.cliffgamerz wrote: ↑02 Aug 2025, 17:08Also well done to Bortoleto for claiming P7 ahead of Max, but tomorrow will be a tough race for him to keep Max behind.
But that shouldn’t make Mclaren slower, unless Mclaren are ‘optimised’ to run in high temps which isn’t really the case when we look at their pace in the wet.
Not sure I buy "Charles risked more". They didn't have anything to lose as they were P1/P3 at the moment of their second runs. Especially Norris didn't have anything to lose.CjC wrote: ↑02 Aug 2025, 17:33But that shouldn’t make Mclaren slower, unless Mclaren are ‘optimised’ to run in high temps which isn’t really the case when we look at their pace in the wet.
Think Lando eluded to it when he said that Charles risked more on his lap.
I know this will open up the armchair hero's who’ll call the Mclaren drivers sub-par but they shouldn’t forget they are both fighting for a drivers championship and simply can not afford to over risk and bin it. Norris has learnt that the hard way in Saudi and Piastri had a slender points margin to be ‘only’ P2
Was you able to see Ant’s analysis on Sky? The drivers didn’t look fully on it to meFittingMechanics wrote: ↑02 Aug 2025, 17:38Not sure I buy "Charles risked more". They didn't have anything to lose as they were P1/P3 at the moment of their second runs. Especially Norris didn't have anything to lose.CjC wrote: ↑02 Aug 2025, 17:33But that shouldn’t make Mclaren slower, unless Mclaren are ‘optimised’ to run in high temps which isn’t really the case when we look at their pace in the wet.
Think Lando eluded to it when he said that Charles risked more on his lap.
I know this will open up the armchair hero's who’ll call the Mclaren drivers sub-par but they shouldn’t forget they are both fighting for a drivers championship and simply can not afford to over risk and bin it. Norris has learnt that the hard way in Saudi and Piastri had a slender points margin to be ‘only’ P2
This car seems to be able to be fine tuned to a specific track temperature in qualifying. They can then extract more than anyone else at that temperature. But if there is a big swing in temperature, they lose more than others because others are not as fine tuned.
McLaren did 1:14s in Q2. Lando did a 1:15:0 on a used set of softs in Q2. That lap by definition was "not risking it" yet it would take pole by ease. It's the temperature fine tuning that McLaren can do, and others can't.
I don't have Sky.
Charles gained 0.1s in T6-7 chicane, was faster in all straights and despite the lower DF was purple in S2 and managed very well in S3, where on the onboard you can see how on the absolute edge he was. Charles put together a lap at the very limit of the car.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑02 Aug 2025, 17:38Not sure I buy "Charles risked more". They didn't have anything to lose as they were P1/P3 at the moment of their second runs. Especially Norris didn't have anything to lose.
This car seems to be able to be fine tuned to a specific track temperature in qualifying. They can then extract more than anyone else at that temperature. But if there is a big swing in temperature, they lose more than others because others are not as fine tuned.
McLaren did 1:14s in Q2. Lando did a 1:15:0 on a used set of softs in Q2. That lap by definition was "not risking it" yet it would take pole by ease. It's the temperature fine tuning that McLaren can do, and others can't.
Top speed were like 7kph down compared to Q2, and that's cross-tail wind you get going into all of the high speed corners, which f*cks up your references. Both McL had a horrific lap and Charles got a good one, but the performance gap is much closer to what it was in FP3.