1. And with these regulations it takes skill and iq to work out the best places to use boost etc. Drivers with more pace still have the chance to get out of the 1s range from the car behind to lessen the chance of an overtake. Im a ferrari fan but people need to accept Mercedes did a better job with the ICE and focus on catching up, not hailing it illegal and complaining...venkyhere wrote: ↑24 Mar 2026, 07:05No. In previous regs, it required a certain amount of skill to follow in the dirty air to be within the 1s window, to use DRS on the straight. It required a certain amount of skill to 'deny' the 1s window to stay in the lead, even if the chasing car gets closer in the slipstream in the straight.DJ Downforce wrote: ↑23 Mar 2026, 20:10Do the "purists" prefer to watch GE boats which stay in the same position they qualified all race? Drs was just as artificial as the battery management.
I fully agree that these regs aren't perfect especially qualifying but it seems some people are just complaining for the sake of it.
With current regs, only 'overtake mode' requires the above skillset to use/deny the advantage in the straight. However, superior/inferior charging/discharging via better S/W or illegal ICE , doesn't require 'driver skill' in the rest of the track until reaching the straight. There is even 'boost mode' that's a 'DRS whenever I want' in any part of the track.
They are chalk and cheese.
why ? why do you keep insisting on separate threads for things you dont like to read ? Just skip. No one is forcing you to read. Or if you like this formula so much that you hate comments criticizing it, come up with arguments to counter. Like you have done above. Otherwise just skip.DJ Downforce wrote: ↑23 Mar 2026, 20:10And my point is that the purists could discuss this in a separate thread...?
2. Because the last race thread was the exact same, it gets tiresome reading the same complaints every week when the point of the thread is the 2026 Japanese grand prix, not the 2026 car complaint thread.

