WhiteBlue wrote:http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2013/07/w ... -red-bull/
There are some real gems in it:
Seb Vettel wrote:I’d prefer Kimi [to Alonso]. I need to be careful now, but nothing against Fernando, I really respect him a lot as a driver, but I respect Kimi on track, off track because he has always been very straight with me. From that point of view it would be a bit easier.
I love the one about Kimi being straight. Remember that Vettel last year accused Alonso and Ferrari to play mind games with him by bringing up the story of Vettel to Ferrari?
James Allan wrote:You don’t need a PhD in semantics to read between the lines of that answer. Vettel’s skill with English and the subtlety of nuance in his answers is always impressive.
Surely Alonso will not inherit Webber's seat easily. A lot of unlikely things would have to come together to facilitate that. But he may see a way to express his frustration at having to drive the wheels off their mediocre cars and not getting a third title in four years. This could spell a new chapter in the story of Alonso at Ferrari similar to Hamilton at McLaren. He came from happy camper over committed to career end and down to totally unhappy about competitiveness.
I disagree, no gems here, as always with Red Bull and Vettel we have three different approaches and changes in marketing bulshiting, like Malaysia:
- I thought Vettel had no say in his future team-mate? Firstly it was 'team harmony' which should be translated as a solid, manageable driver not good or fast enough, then he was involved, then he wasn't and it was all team's decision,
- same with if it matters who it is, firstly it's a team harmony, then he doesn't care with "I can take on anybody" fake posturing, now he cares and we are back to "team harmony"?
- firstly they are buddies with Raikkonen, then Vettel denies it and says it was blown out proportions by media, they are no friends, now this marketing angle took another turn and Raikkonen is a good, honest guy just like Vettel

as opposed to big, bad wolf Alonso?
I can't wait for:
"we considered Alonso but we prefer Ricciardo or Raikkonen because as we said we were looking for the best driver possible for the best team we are". If you are "considering" and he's available, AND you are looking for the best driver you hire Alonso. There has to be a limit for marketing nonsense, they can milk it for a while but everyone knows it's a big joke. I will gladly eat my proverbial hat if it happens. Since it involves Red Bull I won't REALLY eat it and will change my mind three times.
From Ferrari's perspective it's a storm in a tea cup. Alonso said something publicly, nothing outrageous or controversial: Ferrari is slow and he would like a better car, forgetting to say "only better Ferrari", Montezemolo had to say something publicly, too. He didn't really have to but that's politics and posturing, too. In the end he's the one (and his guy Domenicali) responsible for them being behind technologically. Top team without reliable wind tunnel for several season. What are they going to do, replace Fernando and finish 7-8 in every race?
