Stoffel did well considering the time (+0.018 to Alonso):
1 Ricciardo 1m18.486s
2 Raikkonen +0.234s
3 Hamilton +0.372s
4 Verstappen +0.676s
5 Bottas +0.762s
6 Vettel +1.077s
7 Alonso +1.501s
8 Vandoorne +1.519s
9 Hulkenberg +1.664s
10 Palmer +1.975s
Stoffel did well considering the time (+0.018 to Alonso):
It's an expression, I want this done yesterday, as in it's taking a long time.mclaren111 wrote: ↑28 Jul 2017, 10:03What happened yesterday ??godlameroso wrote: ↑27 Jul 2017, 20:16We'll just have to wait and see what becomes of the Honda PU, I still see them making a nice step forward before the end of the year. It sucks that they can't get their act together yesterday, but that's how these things are some times.
I think this is a two fold question, because it involves both the PU deal and the driver deal. here are the facts as I see them:
What can u expect. In maiden season the team was dead last - dont count the Manor because they were only for statistics in that season, in 2016 glimpses of progress were seen (but Haas was a rookie team, Renault was deemed to be uncompetitive), and here we are - a brand new season, a brand new engine and a brand new last spot in the standings.Phil wrote: ↑28 Jul 2017, 15:39I don't know... if I was McLaren, I'd be quite cautious about losing Honda. They're investing too much into McLaren, even as a result of them not performing and therefore losing sponsorships, Honda is effectively balancing that out.
If Honda is pushed out of F1 because they can't get a performing engine and their sole partner is humiliating them race after race (though it has gotten better) and McLaren can't get an engine by Mercedes and Ferrari.... would a Renault engine be better if it meant losing all that money from Honda?
The current proposed regulation for 2021 will still have a lot of ideas carried over, mainly the ICE.Stormy wrote: ↑28 Jul 2017, 22:44Honda said that they are going to continue developing this concept they currently have. Previously they abandoned the concept and started from scratch. Now, they say that they got a good basis to develop. So let's see, i think it's their last chance. If they are not solid midfield next year, they are probably going to pull out. However, from 2021, new engine regulations, more simpler, cheaper and easier to develop i guess. So, another good chance for them to save some face.
Yes but for some reason in the last few races Mclaren race pace was better than it looked in FP.godlameroso wrote: ↑28 Jul 2017, 19:14Speaking of, the McLaren's long run pace is disappointing. Alonso was doing 1:24's where the Ferrari could do high 21's
Alonso heavy fuel run:
22 1:23.689
23 1:23.739
24 1:24.097
25 1:24.647
26 1:24.012
27 1:24.151
28 1:24.214
Ocon heavy fuel run:
25 1:23.522
26 1:23.927
27 1:23.910
28 1:24.017
29 1:23.959
30 1:24.091
31 1:24.020
32 1:25.099
At least the pace is comparable to FI, but far beneath Ferrari
Vettel heavy fuel run:
19 1:22.101
20 1:22.082
21 1:23.787
22 1:21.979
23 1:22.009
24 1:22.588
25 1:22.304
26 1:22.454
Problem is TR, Renault, FI and Williams will have more power in Q.godlameroso wrote: ↑28 Jul 2017, 23:50Then that's very good as the FI's will be McLaren's biggest competition this weekend.
Yeah but Hungary is an aero dependent track and not PU. A set-up similar to Monaco. So they got a chance considering they brought some aero upgrades as well. It's pretty possible to finish 7-8 here.GoranF1 wrote: ↑28 Jul 2017, 23:54Problem is TR, Renault, FI and Williams will have more power in Q.godlameroso wrote: ↑28 Jul 2017, 23:50Then that's very good as the FI's will be McLaren's biggest competition this weekend.