Merc changed the gearbox in two hours which would surely include removing the spring? but it took RBR all day?
Do i smell something......
It's more reliable than MP4-26Phil wrote:I'm quite impressed with McLaren. Combined, they've done 92 laps (52 Magnussen, 40 Button). Hamilton did 62 today.
He lost 2 hours due to a gearbox change tho.Phil wrote:Hamilton did 62 today.
i think the 26 was reliable. it was just a dog with the exhaust they were tryingJavert wrote:It's more reliable than MP4-26Phil wrote:I'm quite impressed with McLaren. Combined, they've done 92 laps (52 Magnussen, 40 Button). Hamilton did 62 today.![]()
Don't you mean it was just an octopus!!astracrazy wrote:i think the 26 was reliable. it was just a dog with the exhaust they were tryingJavert wrote:It's more reliable than MP4-26Phil wrote:I'm quite impressed with McLaren. Combined, they've done 92 laps (52 Magnussen, 40 Button). Hamilton did 62 today.![]()
perhaps, but mercedes have each merc powered team doing different parts of their engine test programme, therefore the total mileage is more important than mileage / carRZS10 wrote:Engine____Laps (total) - avg per team/engine
Mercedes__208_(456) - 114
Ferrari_____92_(230) - 115 (not counting marussia, only did a few installation laps on day three)
Renault____43__(81)_ - 27
so the ferrari engines made as many km/day as the merc units
This to me sounds like they have disabled their electronic anti lag. (is that the MGU-H ?) Therefore their maps will be overly rich and they will be a long way down on power when they change up a gear. Suggest their yesterdays problem were mgu-h related.gibells wrote: All the Ferrari and Merc powered motors seemed to be running really nicely. Both outfits seemed like they have really done their homework. Especially the mercs. All Renaults seem like they are in a heap of trouble. The Toro Rosso sounded awful. Particularly off throttle. Obviously they have transfered the throttle tech over from the atmospherics, but It sounded like it was really struggling to come back on throttle. A strange pickup. They seemed really slow.
no because that was a myth. it was actually something else, search for itDel Boy wrote:Don't you mean it was just an octopus!!astracrazy wrote:i think the 26 was reliable. it was just a dog with the exhaust they were tryingJavert wrote: It's more reliable than MP4-26![]()
of course it is beneficial to do more laps altogether, especially if the teams work on different test programs, which is really surprising as you say... it was just about overall reliability - Mercedes ~ Ferrari >> Renault ... although FI seemed to have problems with some part of the mercedes unit yesterday (today also?)mrluke wrote:perhaps, but mercedes have each merc powered team doing different parts of their engine test programme, therefore the total mileage is more important than mileage / carRZS10 wrote:Engine____Laps (total) - avg per team/engine
Mercedes__208_(456) - 114
Ferrari_____92_(230) - 115 (not counting marussia, only did a few installation laps on day three)
Renault____43__(81)_ - 27
so the ferrari engines made as many km/day as the merc units
Quite impressed the mercedes powered teams are working that way tbh.
Astracrazy - firstly it was mean't as a joke a play on words dog and cat (pus)!! I put a smiley as a clue!astracrazy wrote:no because that was a myth. it was actually something else, search for itDel Boy wrote:Don't you mean it was just an octopus!!astracrazy wrote: i think the 26 was reliable. it was just a dog with the exhaust they were trying