Now let's end Miami.
Couldn't have summed it better! George did a great weekend overall, while a strategic gamble bailed Lewis' miserable weekend.Francis Bacon wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 17:55For me, and perhaps others, the race for the win isn't always what's most interesting. So I am going to introduce a topic that did interest me: Lewis/George/Mercedes. Here's my take:
For most of the race Lewis was running with the likes of Haas, Alfa Romeo, Alpine and not doing much. While he did make it up to P6 by lap 16, it wasn't due to overtakes. The runners ahead him had boxed for hards. Then, starting at ~lap 37, we saw the charge up the field that everyone is talking about: P12 to P6. But was it really impressive? I say no. Cooling track, medium tires, light fuel load...of course he's going to overtake rear-mid-pack cars struggling with old hards. Something would be really wrong if he hadn't.
On the other hand, GR, from race start through lap 18, was holding his own at P5 with the front-runners. After pitting for hards on lap 16, he rejoined at P12 and ran up the field to P4, finsihing ~8 seconds ahead of Sainz. Much more impressive.
When are we going to start giving GR more credit?
Another boring GR/Ham debate.mendis wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 18:37Couldn't have summed it better! George did a great weekend overall, while a strategic gamble bailed Lewis' miserable weekend.Francis Bacon wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 17:55For me, and perhaps others, the race for the win isn't always what's most interesting. So I am going to introduce a topic that did interest me: Lewis/George/Mercedes. Here's my take:
For most of the race Lewis was running with the likes of Haas, Alfa Romeo, Alpine and not doing much. While he did make it up to P6 by lap 16, it wasn't due to overtakes. The runners ahead him had boxed for hards. Then, starting at ~lap 37, we saw the charge up the field that everyone is talking about: P12 to P6. But was it really impressive? I say no. Cooling track, medium tires, light fuel load...of course he's going to overtake rear-mid-pack cars struggling with old hards. Something would be really wrong if he hadn't.
On the other hand, GR, from race start through lap 18, was holding his own at P5 with the front-runners. After pitting for hards on lap 16, he rejoined at P12 and ran up the field to P4, finsihing ~8 seconds ahead of Sainz. Much more impressive.
When are we going to start giving GR more credit?
I disagree on this one. A seven-time WDC struggling against a youngster, much more often than one would expect, is very interesting. So if the GM/Ham debate is boring to you, then every such debate/rivalry must be?DGP123 wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 18:49Another boring GR/Ham debate.mendis wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 18:37Couldn't have summed it better! George did a great weekend overall, while a strategic gamble bailed Lewis' miserable weekend.Francis Bacon wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 17:55For me, and perhaps others, the race for the win isn't always what's most interesting. So I am going to introduce a topic that did interest me: Lewis/George/Mercedes. Here's my take:
For most of the race Lewis was running with the likes of Haas, Alfa Romeo, Alpine and not doing much. While he did make it up to P6 by lap 16, it wasn't due to overtakes. The runners ahead him had boxed for hards. Then, starting at ~lap 37, we saw the charge up the field that everyone is talking about: P12 to P6. But was it really impressive? I say no. Cooling track, medium tires, light fuel load...of course he's going to overtake rear-mid-pack cars struggling with old hards. Something would be really wrong if he hadn't.
On the other hand, GR, from race start through lap 18, was holding his own at P5 with the front-runners. After pitting for hards on lap 16, he rejoined at P12 and ran up the field to P4, finishing ~8 seconds ahead of Sainz. Much more impressive.
When are we going to start giving GR more credit?
GR did well this weekend. Lewis paid for a bad Saturday. Having said that, GR was poor in Baku, where Lewis out-qualified him, overtook him, and then drove off.
It’s nip and tuck between the two. Seems to change every week, with neither being able to get a stranglehold. 14-13 I believe to GR since the start of 2022 season. GR has the upper hand in Q, but Lewis, when issue free, still holds the upper hand on race pace on a Sunday. That’s the picture. End of.
Sorry. I think discussing how two drivers from the same team performed against one another, in the race that is the subject of the thread, is very much on-topic. On the other hand, if the debate is about who is the better driver generally speaking, (looking back at history, etc), then I agree.
Agreed.Sorry. I think discussing how two drivers from the same team performed against one another, in the race that is the subject of the thread, is very much on-topic.
Agreed.On the other hand, if the debate is about who is the better driver generally speaking, (looking back at history, etc), then I agree.
Quite good <> unequal to extraordinary. People on this forum still don’t understand that. Actually, quite good seems very close to solid if I’d had to compare terms. Merc isn’t as poor as their fans would make you believe.Hammerfist wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 23:14People on this forum still dont understand drs trains and how it affects overtaking i guess eh?
Also russell catching sainz was no
biggie: the ferrari just cant keep the tires alive in a race and it will most often fall prey to even the merc. Russell had a solid race. It wasnt extraordinary.
One Merc driver made up 7 places on their start position, the other made up 2. Neither had a hope of catching the leading 3 cars.Sieper wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 23:51Quite good <> unequal to extraordinary. People on this forum still don’t understand that. Actually, quite good seems very close to solid if I’d had to compare terms. Merc isn’t as poor as their fans would make you believe.Hammerfist wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 23:14People on this forum still dont understand drs trains and how it affects overtaking i guess eh?
Also russell catching sainz was no
biggie: the ferrari just cant keep the tires alive in a race and it will most often fall prey to even the merc. Russell had a solid race. It wasnt extraordinary.
Russell even thought he saw Perez in the distance, that’s how poor their own drivers think they are.
He sounded very happy, not confused. In fact, he unknowingly dished out a little burn when his engineer corrected him. “Was about to say” in a try to save face.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑12 May 2023, 07:45One Merc driver made up 7 places on their start position, the other made up 2. Neither had a hope of catching the leading 3 cars.Sieper wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 23:51Quite good <> unequal to extraordinary. People on this forum still don’t understand that. Actually, quite good seems very close to solid if I’d had to compare terms. Merc isn’t as poor as their fans would make you believe.Hammerfist wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 23:14People on this forum still dont understand drs trains and how it affects overtaking i guess eh?
Also russell catching sainz was no
biggie: the ferrari just cant keep the tires alive in a race and it will most often fall prey to even the merc. Russell had a solid race. It wasnt extraordinary.
Russell even thought he saw Perez in the distance, that’s how poor their own drivers think they are.
Russell was confused which is why he asked the question. He thought something unusual must have happened as he didn't expect to see a Red Bull. That's because he knows they're nowhere near Red Bull in pace.