2025 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
f1isgood
f1isgood
4
Joined: 31 Oct 2022, 19:52
Location: Continental Europe

Re: 2025 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

pantherxxx wrote:
13 Sep 2025, 17:09
https://racingnews365.com/red-bull-ques ... nning-ways

"Technical director Pierre Waché said the floor had delivered more performance than anticipated. It is hoped Verstappen will now be competitive at the majority of the remaining eight races."
Hope this is true but it's too late for anything significant unfortunately :(
In any case winning a few more races would be a great way to cap off this cycle.
Call a spade, a spade.

f1isgood
f1isgood
4
Joined: 31 Oct 2022, 19:52
Location: Continental Europe

Re: 2025 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Sergej wrote:
13 Sep 2025, 18:59
He qualified 6th in his category (despite 125hp power deficit and 35kg ballast) and completed the 14 laps in the race, however he couldn't do another stint with another squad because the second car had issue (this was a requisite instead of competing in two different races because he already is FIA grade platinum licensed), so the license for the GT3 is still in doubt. He can either do a second race in the future, or receive an examption from a committee that is evaluating the case. They say that in the past the second was applied in these cases.

https://autoracer.it/max-verstappen-al- ... YwJGwwJGgw
I don't think it's worth reading much into the results. I think the folks driving the cars weren't fully professional either.
Call a spade, a spade.

f1isgood
f1isgood
4
Joined: 31 Oct 2022, 19:52
Location: Continental Europe

Re: 2025 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

venkyhere wrote:
13 Sep 2025, 07:33
f1isgood wrote:
12 Sep 2025, 23:50
You are overstating the amount of technical knowledge that a single person has in a team. Mekies will have to be a special one to have anywhere near as much success as Horner had on track.
You misunderstood what I meant.
Of course, no single person can have knowledge of all the minute details of any moderately complex technological product, forget an F1 car.

What I meant was - regarding the four broad aspects of an F1 car - powertrain, chassis, aero, operations/strategy , having a TP with engineering knowledge will allow him to better judge whether a proposal/idea falls in the category of possible/remotely-possible/absolute-BS/cartoonish etc. This is important, look what happened to Mercedes in the ground effect era. Look how Mclaren transformed once the changes were made at the apex of the technical org, and how Brown isn't the TP. Look how Redbull peaked in the early part of ground effect era, when Newey was in such a 'calling the shots' position. Time is very costly in this budget cap era of F1, so 'getting the calls atleast reasonably correct the first time itself' is more important than ever before. There isn't room to experiment, so not getting blindsided by any one department with an overtly optimistic proposal is important. The TP should be able to decide 'hmm.. maybe X is overestimating his teams ability'. Redbull had Newey in such a role, beside Horner (during both successful and non-successful eras) and that is an important reason for the hit-rate of this team.

It remains to be seen, how good Mekies is, in making such direction calls. Being an engineer is helpful, but not a guarantee. That was my point.
I think I disagree with you on basically most of the points as I think it ignores several aspects. But that's okay as we can all agree to disagree.

Red Bull, Mercedes and Ferrari were all going to the budget cap era with oversized teams, having to necessarily cut people and not expand as much. McLaren expanded during the budget cap era. This meant they could overpay for good people from other teams. Of course having people is only one aspect but putting things together is important and McLaren did that after failing for a good while. Again, I would give due credit to Stella but I would argue his role was much more minimal and what was important was Brown getting the right people and them taking time to put things together.

Mercedes essentially went down a completely different route to everyone else and that meant more undoing than everyone else. I think they spent more time ending up where others ended up a couple of years earlier and with all due respect, they are basically within the same ballpark as Red Bull/Ferrari in half the races. That's not too bad. It's just that when you start behind, it's much harder to chase the final few tenths. I also think they had the biggest brain drain of all teams and that had begun much earlier. From 17-21 they had to more or less iterate the designs to a certain degree, barring the front wing changes of 19 that they benefitted from -- so their relative drop in technical prowess wasn't that visible given they also had an engine advantage. I'd argue their aero team was tested only really in 22 and they got it wrong.

I don't think Newey was calling the shots and at least hasn't called most of the shots since 2018. Newey of course has fantastic experience the engineers draw from but I seriously doubt Newey's expertise is all that is central to a 1000 people team. In that case the team might as well downsize and just pay Newey 100m. You can see what Newey himself has to say about his role in his direct interviews with Mark Hughes from mid 2022. He's just there and if engineers want they'll use his expertise. He had essentially grown beyond most of the technical team's ideation stage. It's also hard to quantify the role he has - but I'd give credit where it's due - to the technical team outside of Newey mostly.

We have 0 evidence that Mekies can make a successful team. I hope for his sake that he can. But nothing we know so far shows anything of that kind but I'll leave this discussion to 2026.
Call a spade, a spade.

User avatar
Sergej
3
Joined: 09 Apr 2024, 19:00

Re: 2025 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

f1isgood wrote:
14 Sep 2025, 11:52
Sergej wrote:
13 Sep 2025, 18:59
He qualified 6th in his category (despite 125hp power deficit and 35kg ballast) and completed the 14 laps in the race, however he couldn't do another stint with another squad because the second car had issue (this was a requisite instead of competing in two different races because he already is FIA grade platinum licensed), so the license for the GT3 is still in doubt. He can either do a second race in the future, or receive an examption from a committee that is evaluating the case. They say that in the past the second was applied in these cases.

https://autoracer.it/max-verstappen-al- ... YwJGwwJGgw
I don't think it's worth reading much into the results. I think the folks driving the cars weren't fully professional either.
I don't think I read into those results, just reported facts. We'll see when he competes in a proper race.

User avatar
Sieper
73
Joined: 14 Mar 2017, 15:19

Re: 2025 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

marcel171281 wrote:
14 Sep 2025, 10:10
Sieper wrote:
14 Sep 2025, 09:30
Leclerc raced Le Mans, for Ferrari. Ok, maybe in a dominant(ish?) car, but still.
Charles Leclerc didn't race Le Mans.
Your right, he was just a spectator. I had it in my mind he also drove. But no.hmmm.