chrisc90 wrote: ↑07 Jul 2022, 13:03
Is it classed as ‘gospel’ and part of the regs if it was only a discussion? Are meetings about standards also treated as part of the regs if not written down?
Merc missed it because they were part of discussions, then didn’t spot it had been omitted in the actual regs.
As far as I know, meetings etc, don’t form part of the rule book.
If the meetings explain how FIA interpret those rules, and they have expressly said to the teams what they view the meaning to be, then I'm afraid anything interpreted outside of that is game for a ban.
Also, I don't quite understand the infatuation with Merc and mugs as it really does distract from the main issues here.
Right now, we know there was a meeting about this last year. We know that flexing of the plank was discussed.
[edited: we dont
know 2 teams fell foul of TD.]
And that's critical.
Because we weren't at the meeting. We don't know what was asked but we know according to
the race that "
stipulated that the rule should be interpreted as the plank should be solid with 2mm tolerance and the way in which the plank and skid and skid blocks are mounted should reflect that".
If this is shown to have been the guidance, and a team contravenes how the FIA have interpreted the rules and then shown the teams how they view it...I don't see how it can be legitimately argued "oh but the rule says..." when it's been said it will be viewed through the FIA interpretation.