Mmgnt wrote: ↑25 Feb 2024, 23:37
I like your explanation and analysis, however after thinking about it for a while, as AmateurDriver said there are too many other uncontrolled variables to come to any conclusions.
Thank you.
Mmgnt wrote: ↑25 Feb 2024, 23:37
Fuel load, tire wear, engine settings are just 3 that affect car behaviour (including accel/decel rate), not to mention whether the driver is actually pushing, and at which points during the lap. Also, consider that the lap you've highlighted was around 7 sec slower than the fastest.
That's exactly the point I am making - the three factors you mention is already encompassed in the 'upwards' direction of the two plots, immediately after each turn. The 'sawtooth' like rise, is coincident almost - telling us that regardless of engine-mode/weight/tyre-state/driver-push differences, the rate of gaining speed was same between both cars. (Actually, if you zoom in and see, the blue is marginally 'above' the red, which further exacerbates the sandbagging theory). So the combined influence of the 4 factors remained the same between red and blue, all the way from the bottom vertices (each slow turn) until near the 'sawtooth sharp end' (braking point before next turn). But suddenly, 'tapering off'/flatlining occurs only for the blue plot and it has a blunt sawtooth, unlike the sharp one the red has.
How can this happen, unless atleast one of the 4 factors, is suddenly changed ? Out of the 4 factors, we can say that the thing that can be immediately changed, at will, at any corner approach speed, is "driver push". And that is exactly what I am hinting at. If the red and blue were not coincident in the 'bottom-to-top' movement from one corner to another, I wouldn't be claiming this.
i am looking for a non-driver related reason that will keep the two plots convergent/overlaid/coincident for all the acceleration phases, but suddenly make them divergent just before the speed shedding starts. For every corner to next corner.