We can only suspect this was the case under James Key so I'm not sure about 10 years, don't think there is evidence to suggest that prior to JK (2019) that the same issue existed, I'm not sure when the matrix management was binned. But yes, it does seem to suggest that someone else was leading design (JK) or that JK made it a committee process for the car and Aero and that PP didn't have as strong a voice as was required.the EDGE wrote: ↑11 Aug 2023, 15:12Yer I read that article this morning, it certainly left me confused as I can't comprehend any trick they may have. Perhaps its just RB playing mind tricks? I can see what The Race are saying, its just a case of getting everything working well together, that is what RB does wellmwillems wrote: ↑11 Aug 2023, 14:39A paralell smaller workstream? Could that be the rear wing they want to look at? Is it something else? Stella has confirmed they have the Rear Wing on the to do list for this year so it certainly sounds like it.
On another note there was an article from Pierre Wache (RB) doing the rounds talking about how surprised ("It's crazy") that after 2 years nobody has figured out their DRS trick yet..! lol
https://www.planetf1.com/news/red-bull- ... fused-drs/
Here is an article about the Red Bull RW and some of its perceived efficiencies - Caveat, this is Gary Anderson lol
https://the-race.com/formula-1/gary-and ... drs-trick/
This also reminds me of a conversation I had with someone earlier in the season who was suggesting a flatter beamwing will help energise the diffuser. According to this article and I believe this to be correct, there is a strong alignment in efficiency between the rear wing and the beam wing and then the beam wing and the diffuser and these need to operate as a package. The RB Beam wing is highly aggressive but requires the RW to operate in tandem in order for the beam wing itself to be efficient. So basically more air needs to be directed cleanly upwards by the RW and less vortices created in all situations to reduce drag on the RW but also to make the beam wing more efficient, double bonus.
I expect the team not to bring a low DF rear wing but to optimise the existing wing to improve the efficiency and produce some small changes to give the RW a cleaner profile and improve a little the geometry of the wing.
Back to the McLaren article... I'm very puzzled about this lineIt soon became very apparent to us that Peter Prodromou was the person that needed to lead Aerodynamics.
Do they mean the man they hired to be head of Aero Wasn't leading the Aero package?
I know we all seem to think we could be armchair TPs, but come on, surely every
one who post's here know's Aerodynamics are the be all, and end all of F1 performance and should be at the sharp end of car design
It makes me kind of angry that nearly 10 years have been wasted
If that is the case we are very lucky PP didn't leave and he has this opportunity to showcase his and his teams skills, he could very well have left. Consider ourselves very fortunate.