2021 Mclaren F1 Team

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
User avatar
Shader
1
Joined: 27 Aug 2017, 15:45
Location: Zenica, BiH

Re: 2021 Mclaren F1 Team

Post

Ron Dennis's comment on recent events:

"I remember many years ago someone telling me 'one swallow doesn't make a summer'," said a cautious Dennis.

"They had a first and second in circumstances that most people would say, 'yeah, but the two leading drivers were out early in the race'.

"But you know they were leading the race and they were holding them off.

"So I think all credit to them, they've made great progress over the last few races and they deserved the one-two."

User avatar
mwillems
45
Joined: 04 Sep 2016, 22:11

Re: 2021 Mclaren F1 Team

Post

Shader wrote:
24 Sep 2021, 08:55
Ron Dennis's comment on recent events:

"I remember many years ago someone telling me 'one swallow doesn't make a summer'," said a cautious Dennis.

"They had a first and second in circumstances that most people would say, 'yeah, but the two leading drivers were out early in the race'.

"But you know they were leading the race and they were holding them off.

"So I think all credit to them, they've made great progress over the last few races and they deserved the one-two."
You don't hear too much from Ron when it comes to Mclaren, it's nice to hear him getting on board with the team. I think he is right too. We had some luck, but we still took the win on Merit.
I'm not taking advice from a cartoon dog

-Bandit

CjC
CjC
14
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 20:13

Re: 2021 Mclaren F1 Team

Post

Early signs look good for Ferrari and that ‘not big of a step of a PU upgrade’🙄
Just a fan's point of view

User avatar
mwillems
45
Joined: 04 Sep 2016, 22:11

Re: 2021 Mclaren F1 Team

Post

CjC wrote:
24 Sep 2021, 11:15
Early signs look good for Ferrari and that ‘not big of a step of a PU upgrade’🙄
It's just P1 remember, we never do much in P1 or P2 and Ferrari do typically seem to run to a higher pace in these sesions.

Lets see P3 and Qualy.
I'm not taking advice from a cartoon dog

-Bandit

User avatar
mclaren111
280
Joined: 06 Apr 2014, 10:49
Location: Shithole - South Africa

Re: 2021 Mclaren F1 Team

Post

mwillems wrote:
24 Sep 2021, 08:43
SmallSoldier wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 19:05
I respect your point of view in regards to ditching this season in order to try and get the best potential start to the following one, it is a valid argument and one that other teams seem to have follow.

My take on the situation is the following:

A) During the exploration / concept phase of the 2022 car, there are no parts been manufactured, the amount of resources used in this phase is relatively low since it’s probably an small group that first needs to agree on the architecture of the car from a mechanical point of view, there isn’t a lot of aerodynamic work yet during this phase, you are looking at potential influence of big surfaces, but you can’t correlate them together without knowing what the architecture is… What is the core of your design team doing at this point? What is the manufacturing team doing at this point?… Those are working on parts for the 2021 car while they are waiting on parts for 2022 to work on.

B) From the article, I also take that most of the parts we’ve seeing coming for the MCL35M were signed off several months ago, which means that the critical resource for the 2022 car was working on next year’s car… While they had a team (mainly production and validation) still focus on the 2021 car.

C) Even though from a probability perspective, the more time you spend in the 2022 car should give you the biggest chance of success next year, the reality is that it may very well not be the case… The team that has apparently spent the most amount of time looking at 2022 is Haas, I don’t think that there is an expectation for them to win the WCC next year… Throwing away 2021 without assurance that it would spell success in 2022 is something that I wouldn’t advice… Furthermore and Key mentions this as well, we were competing in 2021 and it is important for the Team, the Sponsors and Investors that they have the best possible outcome out of the season, ultimately the results from last season and this one are opening up negotiations for better deals with Sponsors for the car, which creates financial stability, additional resources for investment and an stable platform to build upon… For a brand as McLarenF1 to continue to show progress was critical for their long term success (even if that implies not fighting at the front next season)… Maybe one of the reasons why Zak and Andreas keep talking about mounting a fight for WCC as early as 2023 (at which point the rest of the investments in the necessary hardware will be online)… I can see a different point of view from a Fan perspective, since those numbers (financial) behind the scene aren’t at the forefront of the decisions we would make.

D) I tend to believe that the “brain trust” inside the McLaren Team is quiet strong and that decisions such as this (extend focus in 2021 beyond what the competitors may be doing) wasn’t done on a wimp and backed up by sufficient data in regards to pro’s and con’s of doing so… They have a capable team in place and so far the progress showed during the last 3 seasons is proof of that… At this stage, I tend to support their decision based on what we are seeing on track and can only hope that the team will have a strong 2022 season also… Like I said before, I believe that there is a lot of validity to the counter argument, but I have no reasons (nor data) to think that the Team’s thought process and decision in regards to when and how much to focus on 2022 is the wrong one or suboptimal.
Again I do fully respect your opinion but personally hold differently.

Regarding A) and B) We know from the teams statements running up to Silverstone and Hungary and from this one that design continued well after the January sign off and design carried on up until the summer, albeit in a reducing amount

Regarding C, as you acknowledge the probability is that the more time we spend on the 22 car the better 22 might be. But then it goes on to only make a comparison between 21 and 22. But the comparison should be between 22 and the seasons afterwards, versus the rewards of 21. Because what we do for the 22 car is the platform for everything afterwards too. 2021 is a standalone year now and will not benefit 2022.

We were never going to finish lower than 4th this year, it was evident after a few races, so the team have gone all in on the fight with Ferrari for 3rd. I cannot get on board with that. On a Risk reward for this year, there was little risk and little reward for stopping or continuing development, when looking at the outcome of the '21 championship. There is however a bigger risk and reward to the outcome of 22 and the seasons afterwards.

Was it worth sacrificing work on the 22 car to get 3rd instead of 4th? I don't think so. And to use your own logic, there is no assurance of getting 3rd and that the time spent on the 21 car had any benefit at all. If we finish 4th this year, then you'd say it was a waste of resources. You cannot argue that the work on next years car is ever going to be a waste of resources.

Ferrari know that next year is when they need to beat us, and every year after it. The team, Sainz and Leclerc have said that this year is not important to them like other seasons were - something they started saying when they realised it was either 3rd or 4th. So forget HAAS, we are up against Ferrari, Merc and RB and we have the added threat of Renault, Aston Martin, Alpha Tauri and I think Williams too.

We are going to get to '22 and, to quote some gentleman from a fine movie, we may find that "this sh*t just got real" :)
Obviously I don't know what will happen in '22, I just wanted to end that with a quote from Bad Boys 2. :mrgreen:

One of the worst movies in the history of cinema... :D

I do agree on 2022 being a much more imported year than 2021...
Last edited by mclaren111 on 24 Sep 2021, 11:48, edited 1 time in total.

cliffgamerz
cliffgamerz
1
Joined: 02 Feb 2012, 06:49

Re: 2021 Mclaren F1 Team

Post

mwillems wrote:
24 Sep 2021, 11:40
CjC wrote:
24 Sep 2021, 11:15
Early signs look good for Ferrari and that ‘not big of a step of a PU upgrade’🙄
It's just P1 remember, we never do much in P1 or P2 and Ferrari do typically seem to run to a higher pace in these sesions.

Lets see P3 and Qualy.
I will not look forward to P3 or Qualy this weekend :P (Because of rains obviously)

CjC
CjC
14
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 20:13

Re: 2021 Mclaren F1 Team

Post

mwillems wrote:
24 Sep 2021, 11:40
CjC wrote:
24 Sep 2021, 11:15
Early signs look good for Ferrari and that ‘not big of a step of a PU upgrade’🙄
It's just P1 remember, we never do much in P1 or P2 and Ferrari do typically seem to run to a higher pace in these sesions.

Lets see P3 and Qualy.
The disparity between Sainz and Leclerc is what I’m more concerned about.
Sainz and Lando is what I’d expect.
And Daniel......🤷🏼‍♂️
Just a fan's point of view

CjC
CjC
14
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 20:13

Re: 2021 Mclaren F1 Team

Post

cliffgamerz wrote:
24 Sep 2021, 11:47
mwillems wrote:
24 Sep 2021, 11:40
CjC wrote:
24 Sep 2021, 11:15
Early signs look good for Ferrari and that ‘not big of a step of a PU upgrade’🙄
It's just P1 remember, we never do much in P1 or P2 and Ferrari do typically seem to run to a higher pace in these sesions.

Lets see P3 and Qualy.
I will not look forward to P3 or Qualy this weekend :P (Because of rains obviously)
Are you attending the GP?
Just a fan's point of view

User avatar
_cerber1
262
Joined: 18 Jan 2019, 21:50
Location: From Russia with love

Re: 2021 Mclaren F1 Team

Post

CjC wrote:
24 Sep 2021, 12:04
The disparity between Sainz and Leclerc is what I’m more concerned about.
Sainz and Lando is what I’d expect.
And Daniel......🤷🏼‍♂️
Leclair could drive a lap with a real qualifying regime to collect and analyze data.

Ground Effect
Ground Effect
14
Joined: 02 Mar 2018, 12:39

Re: 2021 Mclaren F1 Team

Post

I think it’s important to remember that the 2022 car was originally intended for 2021. The rules, if I remember correctly were firmed up in October 2019, at which time teams were allowed to start working on their cars. So how far behind or ahead a team is, could date back to when they originally started before the COVID-19 enforced postponement and 1st January 2021 restriction. Prior to the launch of the MCL35 in 2020, Zak Brown said the 2021 car (as it was then) was already in the wind tunnel. Since the 2018 debacle, when they stopped working on the 33 early to start on the 34, McLaren has cultivated the habit of using FPs during the season to work on the next years car. They were the first to trial the 2021 floor, sorted out the nose box because of the token restrictions. With car development for the first half of the season sorted out by last Christmas, it’s not impossible that the last set of updates the team have had were in place by May or June. From my side, pound for pound, I’d be surprised if any team is ahead of McLaren on the 2022 car, my opinion.
Q: (Stefano Mancini – La Stampa) Kimi, will you help Vettel to win his championship this year?
Kimi Raikkonen: I can only drive one car, obviously. 
@2018 Singapore Grand Prix drivers press conference.

CjC
CjC
14
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 20:13

Re: 2021 Mclaren F1 Team

Post

_cerber1 wrote:
24 Sep 2021, 12:07
CjC wrote:
24 Sep 2021, 12:04
The disparity between Sainz and Leclerc is what I’m more concerned about.
Sainz and Lando is what I’d expect.
And Daniel......🤷🏼‍♂️
Leclair could drive a lap with a real qualifying regime to collect and analyze data.
Indeed he could have.
I hope for Mclaren and us fans sake you are right🤞🏻
Just a fan's point of view

User avatar
_cerber1
262
Joined: 18 Jan 2019, 21:50
Location: From Russia with love

Re: 2021 Mclaren F1 Team

Post

Are there versions of what details Lando experienced during the session?

cliffgamerz
cliffgamerz
1
Joined: 02 Feb 2012, 06:49

Re: 2021 Mclaren F1 Team

Post

CjC wrote:
24 Sep 2021, 12:05
cliffgamerz wrote:
24 Sep 2021, 11:47
mwillems wrote:
24 Sep 2021, 11:40


It's just P1 remember, we never do much in P1 or P2 and Ferrari do typically seem to run to a higher pace in these sesions.

Lets see P3 and Qualy.
I will not look forward to P3 or Qualy this weekend :P (Because of rains obviously)
Are you attending the GP?
No but tomorrows running will mostly be like Spa's Sunday.

User avatar
_cerber1
262
Joined: 18 Jan 2019, 21:50
Location: From Russia with love

Re: 2021 Mclaren F1 Team

Post

#-o

Seerix
Seerix
0
Joined: 14 Nov 2020, 19:55

Re: 2021 Mclaren F1 Team

Post

The issue should be on old PU as well, right? They use older PUs for FP1/2. 3rd PU is relatively new, they both got it in SPA IIRC.