I looked into it.upsidedowntoast wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 17:51ADUO is tested on a dyno, no? I don't understand how sandbagging in a race performance would affect this. Merc's rationale for sandbagging was probably to preserve the long stint on the hard tyres + engine life.amr wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 13:39It's a game of cat and mouse. Merc slowed down to prevent making the case for ADUO for other teams. Ferrari realised this, and also that they can't really catch and overtake, and it's better to slow down and be just about in the Merc pit window with "protected" tyres while making the case for ADUO. Kimi just did not realise this, is young and eager and no match for the old foxes like Rus Lec Ham. Ham was free to push as he was not damaging the ADUO case since he was not the leading Ferrari.
The technical regulation specifies:
"For each ICE supplied by the PU Manufacturers, an average power will be calculated. The methodology to calculate this power can be found in the document FIA-F1-DOC-Cxxx."
I don't know if it's true, but I don't think that customer teams have ICE dynos. So I don't see how this would be measured on a dyno.
Thinking of it, Merc might be saved by the fact that their customers did not shine as much as they did regarding the PU. So they might be able to make the case that it is not the PU that gives them the edge, but rather the integration.
