2009 spec.JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Forty two
Can I suggest a tit for tat be avoided please?
I hear new front wing due but it too looks the same as barc spec.
2009 spec.JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Forty two
Can I suggest a tit for tat be avoided please?
I hear new front wing due but it too looks the same as barc spec.
Fair play.... Just looking forward to 1st practice I guess!!!JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Forty two
Can I suggest a tit for tat be avoided please?
the top corners looks rounderdren wrote:Old diffusor, launch spec
Bahrain diffusor
Looks the same to me. Maybe the top diffusor starts more towards the front of the car than before.
n smikle wrote:Last year's diffuser and front wing can't be all that bad. I personally don't expect the new ones to look much different. The 2009 ones were probably very good already. So I won't be surprised if the new ones are based on these you see now. The only thing that can rubbish my predictions out the window is if they bring some kinda super mammoth diffuser.outer_bongolia wrote:
Of course, the best reference would be to know which lap of how long a stint they were in when they scored these times. I'm not claiming just looking at the numbers above would be conclusive.
Yet, considering that Merc have been using last year's diffuser and front wing, they are up there and my expectations for their performance in Bahrain is pretty high.
Yep i admit it, Merc is not my team, but Shumacher deserves a good car after all that pre season hype.forty-two wrote:Painful? Why? Sounding a bit fanboy-ish there aren't you Ringo?ringo wrote:for some reason the car does not seem to be as well put together like it's competitors in the top 4. I even think the Renault is much better refined but just lacking the performance.
Reason being, this car doesn't look too far of from last years car in suspension and aero.
Well i hope i am wrong, it's going to be painful seeing Shumacher being outrun by a red bull or ferrari.
nice link Fil, very good explanation