ESPImperium wrote:If its down to harmonics and resonance, is it the engine designers fault for wanting the wrong material for the block, or is it a foundry issue for using the wrong material or wrong process. ........
a stronger grade of a material is not significantly stiffer than ordinary grades
ie cheap iron/steel or aluminium alloy has much the same elastic modulus as expensive, strong iron/steel or aluminium alloy
(if you could boost the elastic modulus of the stronger grades of material you could be a billionaire)
so harmonics/resonance (or forced vibration) problems would be relieved by using thicker material (redesign raising stiffness and natural frequency)
not by keeping the same dimensions and changing the grade of material
50 years ago the Cosworth DFV crank for commonality used the notably large 1 15/16" journal diameter of UK Ford production cranks
so (my interpretation) the early DFV crank was stiffer (higher frequency) than necessary at the time - certainly it needed no crankshaft damper
http://www.grandprixengines.co.uk/cosworthstory.pdf
a crank for a fuel-limit formula would be as slim as bearing loads allow, to minimise friction etc