Honda Power Unit Hardware & Software

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
toraabe
toraabe
12
Joined: 09 Oct 2014, 10:42

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

alexa wrote:
popovic94 wrote:
fiohaa wrote:
so i guess with that logic Redbull will never win a championship because of the Renault team?
McLaren have allways been hiding behind engine when their car was bad, If they got the best engine they cant do that, we can see that in 2014, yes okay somebody will say that Mercedes dont let them win, but why then they didnt finish every race in 3rd and 4th place in 2014?

They where down on power even then because they where using Mobile fuel ,and not petronas , so they had around 30HP less then Mercedes had.
50.

Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
642
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

ESPImperium wrote:If its down to harmonics and resonance, is it the engine designers fault for wanting the wrong material for the block, or is it a foundry issue for using the wrong material or wrong process. ........
a stronger grade of a material is not significantly stiffer than ordinary grades
ie cheap iron/steel or aluminium alloy has much the same elastic modulus as expensive, strong iron/steel or aluminium alloy
(if you could boost the elastic modulus of the stronger grades of material you could be a billionaire)

so harmonics/resonance (or forced vibration) problems would be relieved by using thicker material (redesign raising stiffness and natural frequency)
not by keeping the same dimensions and changing the grade of material

50 years ago the Cosworth DFV crank for commonality used the notably large 1 15/16" journal diameter of UK Ford production cranks
so (my interpretation) the early DFV crank was stiffer (higher frequency) than necessary at the time - certainly it needed no crankshaft damper
http://www.grandprixengines.co.uk/cosworthstory.pdf

a crank for a fuel-limit formula would be as slim as bearing loads allow, to minimise friction etc

toraabe
toraabe
12
Joined: 09 Oct 2014, 10:42

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Could maybe be harmonics that occur only when engine is mounted on gearbox and chassis.

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

toraabe wrote:Could maybe be harmonics that occur only when engine is mounted on gearbox and chassis.
As in NVH induced resonance?
Saishū kōnā

63l8qrrfy6
63l8qrrfy6
368
Joined: 17 Feb 2016, 21:36

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

godlameroso wrote:Wrist pin failure?
It would be primarily a failure of the joint due to oil starvation causing secondary piston failure. Generally an aluminium piston will go before the steel pin does.

Now that I think about it, it is known that small end joints can function without a direct oil feed (even though they have been designed with direct lubrication in mind), particularly when piston cooling nozzles are used. In many cases removing the drilling actually improves the bushing life due to the increase in area and decrease in specific pressure.

If the piston cooling jets fail to provide oil another possible outcome is that the piston overheats and the skirt starts scuffing.


However all of these failures have a well-known tell-tale - a large increase in FMEP before catastrophic failure - therefore it seems unlikely they would occur unexpectedly given how well instrumented these F1 engines are.
But then again the same goes for knock - it's not like they are unaware when they transition from incipient into full blown knock.

Dimi
Dimi
4
Joined: 23 Jan 2017, 18:19

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

If suddenly occurs a black out in electronics, that could lead to loss of control of pneumatic valves and other actuators driving the valvetrain. then you will definitely result with a broken engine and blown pistons. I m really curious what reason can cause these insulation failures only in track conditions and not on the dyno

63l8qrrfy6
63l8qrrfy6
368
Joined: 17 Feb 2016, 21:36

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Dimi wrote:If suddenly occurs a black out in electronics, that could lead to loss of control of pneumatic valves and other actuators driving the valvetrain. then you will definitely result with a broken engine and blown pistons. I m really curious what reason can cause these insulation failures only in track conditions and not on the dyno
Only mechanical regulators are allowed for the pneumatic system.

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Tommy Cookers wrote:
ESPImperium wrote:If its down to harmonics and resonance, is it the engine designers fault for wanting the wrong material for the block, or is it a foundry issue for using the wrong material or wrong process. ........
a stronger grade of a material is not significantly stiffer than ordinary grades
ie cheap iron/steel or aluminium alloy has much the same elastic modulus as expensive, strong iron/steel or aluminium alloy
(if you could boost the elastic modulus of the stronger grades of material you could be a billionaire)

so harmonics/resonance (or forced vibration) problems would be relieved by using thicker material (redesign raising stiffness and natural frequency)
not by keeping the same dimensions and changing the grade of material

50 years ago the Cosworth DFV crank for commonality used the notably large 1 15/16" journal diameter of UK Ford production cranks
so (my interpretation) the early DFV crank was stiffer (higher frequency) than necessary at the time - certainly it needed no crankshaft damper
http://www.grandprixengines.co.uk/cosworthstory.pdf

a crank for a fuel-limit formula would be as slim as bearing loads allow, to minimise friction etc
Resonance is caused by geometry as well, perhaps it can be controlled to within an acceptable level by changing things like firing order, crank geometry, or as you suggested a crank harmonic damper. Maybe find a way to dump the harmonic energy back into the MGU-K for extra propulsion.
Last edited by godlameroso on 11 Mar 2017, 18:01, edited 1 time in total.
Saishū kōnā

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Mudflap wrote:
Dimi wrote:If suddenly occurs a black out in electronics, that could lead to loss of control of pneumatic valves and other actuators driving the valvetrain. then you will definitely result with a broken engine and blown pistons. I m really curious what reason can cause these insulation failures only in track conditions and not on the dyno
Only mechanical regulators are allowed for the pneumatic system.
In other words only cam shafts are allowed?
Saishū kōnā

AndrisV
AndrisV
0
Joined: 21 Apr 2015, 00:30

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

This is my pure IMO. Honda isn't on top of game with controlling burning process on their experimental CC. And they shot themselves in a foot with various engine versions, everybody who has done some ECU mapping will tell you, every engine knocks differently, that is - to ear or microphone. So - active knock control fault. To be blunt - they don't know, when their current engine in a car is actually knocking. Look how long it took Renault to master this.

Since they admitted that they have gone for extremes, probably no safety border for harmonics, add a problem with knock (early V6T era problems) and we have an engine that is limited in power and throws rods.

63l8qrrfy6
63l8qrrfy6
368
Joined: 17 Feb 2016, 21:36

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

godlameroso wrote:
Mudflap wrote:
Dimi wrote:If suddenly occurs a black out in electronics, that could lead to loss of control of pneumatic valves and other actuators driving the valvetrain. then you will definitely result with a broken engine and blown pistons. I m really curious what reason can cause these insulation failures only in track conditions and not on the dyno
Only mechanical regulators are allowed for the pneumatic system.
In other words only cam shafts are allowed?
No, it means that if you have pneumatic valve springs you can only use a mechanical regulator for the feed from the pressure vessel.

I read Dimi's comment as 'pressure regulator failed shutting off air supply to the pneumatic springs, causing valves to drop'

You don't seriously think they use anything other than a camshaft though, do you ?

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Mudflap wrote:
godlameroso wrote:
Mudflap wrote:
Only mechanical regulators are allowed for the pneumatic system.
In other words only cam shafts are allowed?
No, it means that if you have pneumatic valve springs you can only use a mechanical regulator for the feed from the pressure vessel.

I read Dimi's comment as 'pressure regulator failed shutting off air supply to the pneumatic springs, causing valves to drop'

You don't seriously think they use anything other than a camshaft though, do you ?
Logic dictates they would, but who knows.
Saishū kōnā

63l8qrrfy6
63l8qrrfy6
368
Joined: 17 Feb 2016, 21:36

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

godlameroso wrote:
Mudflap wrote:
godlameroso wrote:
In other words only cam shafts are allowed?
No, it means that if you have pneumatic valve springs you can only use a mechanical regulator for the feed from the pressure vessel.

I read Dimi's comment as 'pressure regulator failed shutting off air supply to the pneumatic springs, causing valves to drop'

You don't seriously think they use anything other than a camshaft though, do you ?
Logic dictates they would, but who knows.
If by logic you mean unproven high-risk technology then maybe that explains the situation they are in. On the off-chance that I am completely wrong and Honda have indeed developed some sort of electro-hydraulic valve actuation then they are doing remarkably well!

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Logic dictates they would use 4 cam shafts, but IF they're not, it would be pretty impressive, especially if they get it to work. Let's just leave that to some dream with no bearing on reality.
Saishū kōnā

User avatar
popovic94
1
Joined: 29 Jan 2014, 23:52

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Mudflap wrote:
godlameroso wrote:
Mudflap wrote:
No, it means that if you have pneumatic valve springs you can only use a mechanical regulator for the feed from the pressure vessel.

I read Dimi's comment as 'pressure regulator failed shutting off air supply to the pneumatic springs, causing valves to drop'

You don't seriously think they use anything other than a camshaft though, do you ?
Logic dictates they would, but who knows.
If by logic you mean unproven high-risk technology then maybe that explains the situation they are in. On the off-chance that I am completely wrong and Honda have indeed developed some sort of electro-hydraulic valve actuation then they are doing remarkably well!
Koeniggseg Freevalve?
"Whoever you are, no matter what social position you have, rich or poor, always show great strength and determination, and always do everything with much love and deep faith in God. One day you will reach your goal." Ayrton Senna