Why not? I mean - I don't know if it will be a better or worse thing to do overall, but I don't see why they can't do that.
To be honest, Interlagos - this far out, weather reports aren't reliable yet. I'll wait for Thursday at least.
what has happend since Silverstone?raymondu999 wrote:Why not? I mean - I don't know if it will be a better or worse thing to do overall, but I don't see why they can't do that.
To be honest, Interlagos - this far out, weather reports aren't reliable yet. I'll wait for Thursday at least.
Agreed, Ferrari had that great early win in the rain, probably thanks to Perez and probably also as a result of the early 'Pirelli Spice' where you only had to fluke a setup to win a race (see: Maldonado) so it was less about core car strengths than 'hit and hope'. The cars have developed considerably since then. Silverstone was a good example of how Ferrari couldn't replicate the wet win. There's nothing I've seen that makes me think the Ferrari is any more of a threat in the wet over a Red Bull or McLaren - who have also been up there in every wet race. If anything, I'd say Ferrari are slightly behind in wet running, rather than a clear threat.infy wrote:I dont think it is a matter of Ferrari being great in the wet, but instead everyone else was just behind in tire heat-up compared to them. You could say RBR's recent qualifying advantage comes from how much quicker they heat their tires up. I dont see how that can be anything but an advantage in the rain.
Nice drawings mate, you & Z do good work. Are you trying to say the red on the 2nd picture is new?
The parts highlighted red were introduced in Abu Dhabi! So it is essentially the new front wing that was used in Abu Dhabi...Crucial_Xtreme wrote:Nice drawings mate, you & Z do good work. Are you trying to say the red on the 2nd picture is new?
viewtopic.php?f=12&t=11778&p=392047#p392047raymondu999 wrote:In the dry - I always thought Austin would be the better Ferrari circuit. Fast sweepers etc have been the Ferrari strength. Traction, slow corners - have generally, in my view, been their bane since Singapore/Hungary.
I read that - and I don't share that opinion. In Abu Dhabi, in Singapore, in Hungary - the car displayed a lack of any decent turn in or traction in the slow corners.F1.Ru wrote:viewtopic.php?f=12&t=11778&p=392047#p392047raymondu999 wrote:In the dry - I always thought Austin would be the better Ferrari circuit. Fast sweepers etc have been the Ferrari strength. Traction, slow corners - have generally, in my view, been their bane since Singapore/Hungary.
Just to remind what i said earlier .............